Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Customer costs are those associated with serving customers regardless of the amount of water <br />used, i.e., meter reading, accounting, billing, etc. <br /> <br />The allocation of cost between base and extra capacity components depends upon the design and <br />use of the particular portion of the water system being analyzed. If an asset of the water system <br />is designed to meet only the average demand on the system - a raw water supply reservoir for <br />instance - the capital costs and operation and maintenance costs for that asseta.re totally allocated <br />to the base component. If the asset is designed to provide additional c~pa.city whiph is needed to <br />provide peak demand on the system, the capital and operating costs assoCiated withthe asset are <br />allocated to base and extra capacity components in the samepl'oportion that the capacity Qfthe <br />asset is used for average and peak use. The appropriate allocation factors between base J:lIld extra <br />capacity usually vary from system to system. TherefQh~,tl:1ey shoulci be determined from actual <br />operating history or design criteria of the system. <br /> <br />The other important consideration foriisetti;ng equitable rates for utility servIce IS the <br />establishment of customer classes for cost distribution. after costs are allocated to servIce <br />functions. A customer class should include orily tl:1()se custolll~rs who; (a) are in similar location <br />in relation to the utility, (b) use the same or sitriilar facilities of the utility, (c) receive similar <br />service from the utilit)',arid (d) plase similar deIIl~dsof the utility. It is important to note that <br />makeup of the custOl11~r class cari.Pl:1l:Wge depending upon the particular asset that is being <br />allocated. A customer class that is appropriate for allocation of one type of cost, e.g., water <br />treatment cQsts,IIlayjnclude customers that would not be appropriate to the class when another <br />type of<:ost of assetsisa1located,>~.g., treated water distribution costs. The objective of cost <br />allocation and ultimate distribution to customer groups is to avoid cross-subsidization, and it is <br />important with that obj~ctive in view, differences in service commitment and service <br />requirement be given f\.lllconsideration in determining customer classes. <br /> <br />City of Paris, Texas <br />Water and Wastewater Cost of Service Study <br />June 2007 <br /> <br />6 <br />