Laserfiche WebLink
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT <br />STATEMENT OF INTENT FILED BY ATMOS ENERGY, CORP., <br />MID -TEX DIVISION ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2007 <br />12. Atmos and the ACSC Cities agree that the Company's requested revision of its weather <br />normalization adjustment ( ")WNA ") mechanism is appropriate, as modified by ACSC, <br />and should be approved as set forth in Exhibit A to this Settlement Agreement. <br />Specifically, the revision excludes non - weather sensitive commercial customers and <br />modifies the WNA mechanism to calculate the WNA adjustment based on weather <br />stations at a regional level rather than under the current practice of associating all <br />customers with a single weather location for purposes of determining the WNA <br />adjustment. <br />13. Atmos and the ACSC Cities agree that the three -year gas cost review process that is <br />currently in effect for the Mid -Tex division should be eliminated. Atmos and the ACSC <br />Cities further agree to collaborate to establish an alternate process wherein the prudence <br />of gas costs recovered through the Rider GCR can be addressed. Until an agreed upon <br />replacement mechanism has been established, the current gas cost review process shall <br />remain in effect, unless changed by order of the Commission. <br />14. It is the intention of the Signatories that the ACSC Cities receive the benefit of any <br />settlement agreement that Atmos enters into with other entities arising out of GUD No. <br />9672 (consolidated cases) or any associated appeals of GUD No. 9672. Therefore, Atmos <br />agrees that if the rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or benefits accruing to the settling <br />entity would be more beneficial to the ACSC Cities than the terms of this Settlement <br />Agreement, as determined by the ACSC Cities, such more favorable rates, revenues, terms <br />and conditions, or benefits shall additionally accrue to the ACSC Cities. Similarly, if the <br />Final Order in GUD No. 9672 or orders resulting from any associated appeals are <br />determined by the ACSC Cities to result in rates, revenues, terms and conditions, or <br />benefits that are more beneficial than the terms or this Settlement Agreement, such more <br />favorable terms, revenues, terms and conditions shall additionally accrue to the ACSC <br />Cities. However, the Signatories agree that the approval of the Rider RRM, the Rider <br />WNA, the Rider CEE, and the Rider GCR, as shown in Exhibit A hereto, shall not be <br />affected by the application of the "most favored nations" provisions contained in this <br />paragraph, it being the understanding and the intent of the Signatories hereto that such <br />tariffs shall continue in effectiveness according to their terms. The Signatories further <br />agree that the agreement reflected in paragraph 10 of this Settlement Agreement shall not <br />be affected by the application of the "most favored nations" provisions contained in this <br />paragraph. <br />15. Atmos agrees to reimburse the ACSC Cities previously incurred rate case expenses <br />within 30 days of the date the last ACSC City ordinance approving this Settlement <br />Agreement is entered, and any additional rate case expenses incurred through the date of <br />the entry of the last ACSC City ordinance, within 30 days of receipt of invoices. <br />16. Atmos agrees to reimburse the ACSC Cities for expenses associated with all 2003, 2004, <br />2005, and 2006 GRIP filings and related court appeals up to $567,213 within 30 days of <br />the date the last ACSC City ordinance approving this Settlement Agreement is entered. <br />17. Atmos and the ACSC Cities further agree that all expenses reimbursed pursuant to <br />paragraphs 15 and 16 of this Settlement Agreement, as well as all reasonable rate case <br />4 <br />