Laserfiche WebLink
Critics have said the new method could allow asbestos fibers into the air, endangering nearby <br />residents. They argued last week that the EPA should move the test to an isolated location. <br />Two previous tests have been conducted in relatively isolated areas in Fort Smith, Ark. <br />"I think it was the height of irresponsibility to proceed with this human experiment in a <br />populated area," said 7ohn Walke, clean air director for the Natural Resources Defense <br />Council, a national environmental group. <br />Scott Frost, a trial lawyer associated with Public 7ustice, said EPA officials' "only agenda <br />is to get their test results." <br />Demolition work began at about 7 a.m. Monday as people nearby walked to school and work on <br />Boca Raton Boulevard. An hour later, an excavator began flattening the building. The EPA had <br />set up rows of air-sampling monitors at the site. <br />The crews planned to remove about 3 inches of dirt to catch any fibers that soaked into the <br />ground. It would have taken a specially trained crew two days just to remove the asbestos <br />under the old method, said EPA project manager Adele Cardenas Malott. <br />Terry Lynch, the health hazard administrator for the national asbestos workers union, said <br />there's no way to know whether any asbestos was released. <br />ASBESTOS ABATEMENT <br />The issue <br />The federal Environmental Protection Agency demolished a 2,200-square-foot office building at <br />the Oak Hollow apartments on Boca Raton Boulevard in Fort Worth using a new technique that <br />allows workers to take down the building without removing the asbestos. Normally, workers <br />would seal the building in plastic, filter the air and remove asbestos by hand while wearing <br />protective suits. But that process is time-consuming and expensive. <br />The new method <br />It calls for workers to soak the inside and outside walls and popcorn-textured ceiling with a <br />special foam and treated water. The building is demolished with heavy equipment, and the <br />water is contained on site by dirt berms. The top 3 inches of soil are removed after the <br />demolition. <br />The concern <br />Leaving asbestos-laden material in the building during demolition creates the possibility of <br />asbestos fibers drifting into the air and traveling far from the site. That could expose many <br />people to asbestos a fibrous mineral that can scar the lungs and cause cancer if it is <br />inhaled. Andy Oberta, a well-respected asbestos consultant in Austin who has followed the <br />issue closely, said he worries about what will happen if this method is approved for use at <br />buildings across the country. "You're going to have contractors that are not going to use the <br />same care they did while the EPA was looking over their shoulders," he said. "They're not <br />going to use this expensive foam. They're going to be out there with a garden hose." <br />Past tests <br />Fort Worth officials have been working on the method for about 12 years. The EPA has tested <br />it twice before on buildings on part of the Fort Chaffee Army reserve base in Fort Smith, <br />Ark. The first test, in April 2006, was deemed inconclusive. A second test is under review. <br />What's next <br />z <br />) <br />