Laserfiche WebLink
"It's a predominantly minority community, and it's doing it on the cheap, and it's putting <br />people at risk," he said. <br />Scott Frost, a Dallas lawyer who specializes in asbestos cases and is affiliated with Trial <br />Lawyers for Public Justice, said the EPA and the city have tried to play down the risks. <br />"Even very minute exposures to asbestos can cause cancer, period," he said. <br />Frost helped fight the plans to use the wet method to demolish the Cowtown Inn. He is suing <br />St. Louis over similar "wet demolitions" near Lambert Airport. <br />City Environmental Director Brian Boerner said the wet method is safe. And if proven <br />effective, he said, the wet method could make it easier for cities to rehabilitate old <br />buildings with asbestos, which is a major obstacle in many inner-city neighborhoods. <br />Fort Worth has "dozens, if not hundreds" of such buildings, Boerner said. "Then you think <br />about Dallas, Austin, Houston." <br />Fort Worth has been trying to demolish Oak Hollow for years. The city sued the owners of Oak <br />Hollow and other apartments over violations of city codes and later bought the complexes with <br />an eye toward demolishing them to make way for redevelopment. <br />The City Council has approved about $1.5 million to demolish the apartments. <br />Boerner stressed that the EPA is leading the wet-method demolition. Fort Worth officials, who <br />originally proposed using the wet method to speed the demolition of asbestos-containing <br />buildings, haven't been involved in the testing since 2005. <br />The EPA has tested the method twice within the past two years on an isolated parcel that was <br />part of the Fort Chaffee Army reserve base in Fort Smith, Ark. The agency has not conducted a <br />health risk assessment of the alternative method, nor does it plan to, said Adele Cardenas <br />Malott, a program manger in the EPA's regional office in Dallas who's working on the <br />alternative method proposal. <br />The guideline the agency must meet, she said, is no visible asbestos in the air. That angers <br />some environmentalists, residents and asbestos abatement experts. <br />"It's stupefying," said 7ohn Walke, clean-air director for the Natural Resources Defense <br />Council, an environmental group that had opposed the Fort Worth method. "It's just incredible <br />how wrong and unthinking they are to continue to inflict the same method on the same <br />residents." <br />Federal regulators say they are taking steps to ensure that the test is safe. They will set <br />up an extensive network of air monitors around the site and erect a scaffolding wall, covered <br />in plastic tarp, to try to keep materials from escaping the site, said Roger Wilmoth, chief <br />of the industrial multimedia branch in the EPA's Office of Research and Development in <br />Cincinnati. <br />"We're doing everything we could possibly think of," he said. "Obviously, if we thought there <br />was any possibility of exposure of the residents, we would not conduct the tests in an <br />occupied area." <br />ASBESTOS DEMOLITION <br />The issue <br />z <br />51 (b) <br />