Laserfiche WebLink
Ron Dokell, president of Demolition Consultants in Houston and another member of the panel, <br />was more optimistic. He said he doesn't think anyone around the Oak Hollow property is in <br />danger. <br />"If it's done properly, safetywise, it's just as good as any other method," he said. <br />Still being tested <br />Under current federal law, materials containing asbestos must be removed before a building is <br />demolished. That's required in the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, <br />or NESHAP. <br />The 2,200-square-foot Oak Hollow office building is scheduled to be demolished with what is <br />now being called the alternative asbestos control method. In this case, the office will be <br />doused with foam to reduce the chances that dust will be kicked up. The building will then be <br />demolished with the asbestos still intact. All the building material would be disposed of in <br />a landfill authorized to take asbestos-tainted material. <br />The rest of the apartment complex will be torn down using the traditional method of removing <br />the asbestos before demolition. <br />Brian Boerner, Fort Worth's environmental management director, said the peer review study <br />from Fort Chaffee in Arkansas and data from a second test at the base earlier this year are <br />promising. He said it's possible this could be safer than the standard method. <br />"When you read the peer review in its totality, it is encouraging," Mr. Boerner said. <br />Fort Worth wanted to use this method to demolish the former Cowtown Inn motel in 2004. But <br />the EPA backed off because of opposition f rom nearby residents and environmentalists. <br />Mr. Boerner said that testing and refining, including the use of foam instead of water, have <br />made the method safer and more effective. <br />Adele Cardenas Malott, an asbestos NESHAP program manager for the EPA, said this will be the <br />agency's third test of the alternative method and part of continuing research about whether <br />and how to change its rules governing asbestos removal. <br />"That will be a very long and time-consuming process," she said. <br />Opposition <br />Representatives of Public Interest, the group that fought the use of the Fort Worth method at <br />the Cowtown Inn, said the method is not ready for testing in a populated area. They said at a <br />news conference Monday that the dangers are still too great. The federal government has ruled <br />that there is no safe level of exposure to asbestos. <br />"There is no doubt that asbestos will be released into the community," said Scott Frost, a <br />lawyer working with Public 7ustice. <br />He said the health consequences of this test won't be known for 20 or 30 years. Cancer and <br />lung diseases caused by asbestos often take decades to develop. <br />Fredy Polanco, a peer review panelist and member of the Asbestos Advisory Committee for the <br />Texas Department of Health, said this method has the potential to be safe, but he's concerned <br />z <br />61 (e) <br />