My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06 a., b., & c. Record of Standing Committee
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2008
>
07 July
>
2007-07-14
>
06 a., b., & c. Record of Standing Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2012 12:51:15 PM
Creation date
7/11/2008 5:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
06 a., b., & c.
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
Records of Standing Committee
AGENDA - Date
7/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
effluent? <br />When it crosses the threshold of that dam, it ceases to be solely within the control of the State of Texas <br />and subject to the Compact. <br />OK, question No. 20. If it is determined that there is no excess water to sell, or if Paris enters into a <br />contract to sell a large quantity of water to the City of Irving or anyone else, all Pat Mayse water..... <br />Let me make a couple of general obligations: you have a wonderful source of water in Pat Mayse. And <br />so instead of selling all your water out of Pat Mayse, I think iYs very prudent to plan for your future growth <br />out of that Pat Mayse source. To the extent that you can develop alternate sources of water that may be <br />marketable and give you a return because of the revenue stream, I would look to do that and try to <br />capitalize off of those. <br />One of the most common ways these days that cities are developing new sources of supplies is <br />beneficial reuse of their treated effluent return flow. I know from talking with your staff today that you have <br />2 or 3 mgd of discharge out of your wastewater treatment plant. I know that that is situated in a place <br />where it may be possible to combine that with any water sold to Irving out of Lake Pat Mayse. And so that <br />would be one potential way to get revenue off of that resource. <br />Reeves Hayter: is that water controlled by the compact? <br />JM: no. The water you sell by contract to other parties, and they discharge after they use it, is subject <br />to reuse by the city. Because permit wise, it's still your water. I know little of the specifics, but if Lamar <br />Power Partners takes your water for cooling water and after use, they treat and discharge that water into <br />a water course, and there's some economic use of that water downstream, you should go seek a bed and <br />bank authorization to be able to reuse that water and sell it to a third party. A lot of cities are reusing their <br />effluent and other water for landscape irrigation purposes, if you have enough golf courses and other <br />things, so I would look to those kind of things to try to get economic benefit. <br />But for purposes of your planning, whatever transactions you're going to do with Irving or anyone else, I <br />would be looking to your longterm needs and your growth horizon and figure what amount of water you <br />need to reserve for yourself out of Pat Mayse Lake, and when you're trying to determine what's truly <br />surplus, I would look for some amount of reservation of that water. You can sell some of it to Irving with <br />some right to take it back, or sell it to somebody else with the right to take it back, but I would want to go <br />through some sort of engineering analysis, where you knew, here's what Paris' current water demands <br />are, here's what they are projected to be in 2060, and put something in in terms of what you think you're <br />going to need, because, you know, iYs a source thaYs virtually paid for. And so you want to use water as <br />an economic resource to generate revenue for the city and keep costs down, but at the same time you <br />want to be able to take advantage of the resources that you have developed. So just in the planning <br />process, try to look down the road as best you can as to what your needs are going to be, and take those <br />into account. <br />I tend to look at water as a purely economic issue. Water has a lot of value, and it's becoming more <br />valuable everyday. And so I know locally you probably look at it as a lot of different buckets, a lot of <br />different characteristics, but factor in the economic value to you and how it might work to your benefit over <br />the long term. <br />Question: (inaudible) <br />JM: You have to use the best crystal ball analysis of what your future needs are going to be. You can <br />structure that into a contract. You can start off selling to Irving 100 percent of your surplus, and 10 years <br />from now you could sell them 90 percent of your surplus. And then 80 percent. So you can tell them, we <br />have some water. There will be times we'll be needing some of that water back, and so you can have an <br />adjustment mechanism in the contract. I've even seen contracts where you tell them here's how much <br />water we think we can give you, and you can come and take this water with the reservation that if we <br />~ O00(146- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.