06 a., b., & c. Record of Standing Committee

Home Browse Search

of Lake Pat Mayse and Lake Crook to improve combined yield of both parties. Another question raised was the evaluation of potential uses for return flows of raw water sold to Lamar Power. Mr. Choffell said they would need to obtain additional data prior to making a determination. Mr. Choffell informed the Committee that he did not believe there was much ground water and there had been a lot of opposition every time that issue comes up. Chairman Hayter inquired who would receive HDR's report. Mr. Choffell said their report would be going to the Committee. He said they would be reviewing and evaluating the City's water contract. There was discussion about two different methods in evaluating sediment in Pat Mayse. Chairman Hayter said he was not comfortable with estimates. Ray Ball asked Ken Coffel if there was information he thought was important that the Committee had not inquired about. Mr. Coffel emphasized constructing a contract to protect the interest of Paris. He referenced the amount of water it would take to justify building of a pipeline, interruptible amount of water during wet and dry years, the city's future use, the four big water contracts, commitment for a specified number of years and review prior to expiration. He also suggested during the term of the contract, the entities work together to bolster supply from other sources. 4. Review and discuss the briefing books. Shawn Napier presented the Committee Members with additional handouts for their briefing books. Possible future agenda items. It was a consensus of the Committee to count this meeting as a regular meeting and next meet on June 26"' 6. Adjournment. There being no further business, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made by Herb Campbell and seconded by John Kruntorad, motion carried unanimous. The meeting was adjourned at 6:10 p.m. 4~ Approved this~~~ day June, 008. Reeves Hayter, Page 2 of 2 - 0O0(l5`'