Laserfiche WebLink
C. Capital Costs (Forrn 4) <br />Providing municipal solid waste services requires that equipment, facilities and land_be purchased and <br />used. Some of the "smaller' asset purchases are often financed with "cash capital outlays." In these <br />instances, the assets are paid for with cash, rather than through the issuance of debt. Larger capital <br />purchases such as land, the construction of facilities, and the purchase of some types of equipment are <br />usually funded with debt. <br />Cash capital outlays are used as a"financing vehicle" by most solid waste utilities and are often <br />relatively constant from one year to the next. As such, the historical cash capital outlays of a municipal <br />solid waste program service can often be used to predict future cash capital outlays. Financing larger <br />expenditures with debt allows the ratable collection of funds over the life of the asset. <br />Since most municipalities operate on a cash basis, this workbook uses what is called a'mod'rfied cash <br />basis" to ensure the establishment of cost of service based solid waste rates. Using annual principal <br />and cash capital outlays in lieu of depreciation expense is an important difference between the modified <br />cash basis and the accrual basis. The modified cash basis is preferred in the development of cost of <br />service and rate design studies,-since the purpose of these studies is to capture the full "cash" cost of <br />providing the solid waste service on an annual basis. As mentioned earlier in the workbook, there are <br />situations where the use of depreciation expense in the establishment of solid waste rates would <br />generate insufficient cash revenues on an annual basis to recover the debt service associated with an <br />asset. <br />As mentioned in the Vehicle Expense Section (Forms 2 and 3), many municipalities use an internal <br />services fund to purchase and maintain equipment. These funds purchase the required equipment and <br />then "lease" it to the other city departments using a depreciation factor. This is an acceptable <br />methodology, with the lease payment used in lieu of debt service, especially since these assets are <br />often purchased with cash instead of debt. For purposes of this wor{dbook, the internal services fund <br />"lease cost" appears on the workbooks Vehicle Expense Form (Form 2), in anticipation of the same <br />internal services fund also providing maintenance and repair activities as well. <br />If a solid waste program plans to purchase a major piece of equipment without using debt, or an <br />internal services fund, its impact on "cash capital outlays" will be significant at the time of purchase and <br />not acceptable from a rate design viewpoint. In this special case an amortization factor should be used <br />in order to recoup the cash outlay ratably over the life of the asset. This situation is referred to as an <br />"extraordinary cash outlay" on Form 4. In this case, the annual cost of the asset is determined by <br />dividing the purchase price by the forecasted service I'rfe. Salvage values, when realized, will be <br />recorded in the "Other Revenue" section of Form A, Program Cost Summary. <br />Form 4, Capital Costs, is a form that can help a city determine the annual capital costs needed for each <br />solid waste program by considering the annual cash outlays and debt service associated with each <br />program. The city will need to complete a Capital Costs Form for each of the cit/s solid waste <br />programs. This will allow the city to clearly identify the capital costs associated with each solid waste <br />program. <br />Form 4 has the following entries: <br />Service Provider: Name of city, government agency, or private <br />operator completing the worldbook. <br />• Date Prepared: Date the form is completed. <br />15 <br />. 000215 <br />