My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-08-20-PEDC
City-of-Paris
>
Boards and Commissions
>
PEDC
>
1993-2016
>
2003
>
2003-08-20-PEDC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2006 4:35:40 PM
Creation date
1/12/2004 8:04:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
2003
Doc Type
Minutes
CITY CLERK - Date
8/20/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> zoning. He questioned the purpose of the association or the corporation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vest explained that it is because of the common area and the maintenance <br /> of it. The City Attorney advised that this is a form of a vehicle of transition of <br /> ownership from the PEDC to the owners of the property. They need to create <br /> it, keep it up for a while until there are enough lots sold and it is self sustaining, <br /> then it shifts to them and becomes their responsibility and the PEDC is out of the <br /> picture. <br /> <br />Mr. Vest said normally a developer comes in and they will do a residential <br />development. Most of the time they .want to deed the streets back over to the <br />city once it is built. He said he did not think the city is real crazy about having <br />-those, but that normally is the way it goes. He said they have a lot of common <br />area like this retention pond that is going to have to be maintained and these <br />covenants will assure that common area will be taken care of. <br /> <br /> City Attorney Schenk said if the Board went strictly with.an association they <br /> would have to change back some of the language that they currently have in it <br /> to make it a .corporation, but it would not be all that difficult. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vest pointed out that in the Bylaws all the changes were shaded. <br /> <br /> City Attorney Schenk referred to "Article I - Officers" of. the introductory <br /> paragraph, the last sentence where it talks about the Board of Directors shall <br /> have full authority to remove from office any officer of the Corporation by the <br /> vote of a majority of the members of the entire Association. He suggested <br /> restoring the language that he. had before, which was reference to the Board, and <br /> to add some additional language about the issue of the membership having rights. <br /> to remove, and change the word Association to Board. The City Attorney .said <br /> he had language to add at the end that says alternately the members of the <br /> Association shall have authority to remove from office any officer of the <br /> Corporation, but only in a regular or special called meeting with the membership <br /> and only upon a majority vote of the members of the entire Association. <br /> <br /> City Attorney Schenk discussed another proposed change in "Article II"of the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.