Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IV. SUM1\'lAR Y <br /> <br />A. Comparison of Plant Performance from Initial Comprehensive Performance <br />Evaluation to the Texas Optimization Program Goals Achieved <br />Utilizing the initial comprehensive performance evaluation as a baseline for performance, <br />comparison and evaluation, Figure 19 illustrates the settled water turbidity frequency plot. <br />Settled water turbidity has been improved from meeting a 2.0 NTU less than 25 percent <br />of the time, to meeting a 2.0 NTU 99.9 percent of the time. Figure 20 illustrates the <br />bottom line results for finished water turbidity frequency plot. The plant performance <br />increased from achieving a 0.1 NTU approximately less than 5 percent of the time to <br />achieve a 0.1 NTU over 100 percent of the time. <br /> <br />Figure 19': Settled Water Turbidity Performance <br /> <br />Com,.,I..n c:"r.,. TO,. S.tUed <br /> <br /> ",0 <br /> U.' <br /> 11.' <br />~ 1.1 <br />f <br />! 1.1 <br /> ... <br /> t.1 <br /> I.' <br /> ... <br /> <br />" <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />s.. <br /> <br />10'1. 2'" ".... "" ,.." <br />,.,..". .,~....",.... Tu,."lty Iltew" <br /> <br />os.. <br /> <br />lOCI'" <br /> <br />Figure 20: Finished Water Turbidity Perfo-fmance <br /> <br />',.qu."., "Iell .'Ma.lmun Dally 'Inlshed W.t., Turbldhy <br /> <br /> .... <br /> '.S' <br /> -.'" <br />~ <br />f.... <br />1 <br />.. <br /> '.11 <br /> I." <br /> .... <br /> "" <br /> <br /> <br />s.. <br /> <br />".. U"A U'" 11'" ,." <br />p.,.."ra,_" Jt..4IIN,_ c. T.,..lII'", .lte.1I <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />..... <br />