My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-057-RES APPROVING A NEW SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND ASSOCIATED EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CITY MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, AND MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE
City-of-Paris
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
1889-2010
>
2004
>
2004-057-RES APPROVING A NEW SYSTEM OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND ASSOCIATED EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CITY MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY, AND MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2006 4:27:25 PM
Creation date
4/27/2004 10:09:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
2004
Doc Type
Resolution
CITY CLERK - Date
3/8/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Executive Being Evaluated: City Attornev <br />Evaluator: <br />Evaluation Date: <br /> <br />INSTRUCTIONS FOR EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVES <br />BY CITY OF PARIS CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />Use the following guidelines to evaluate employee's performance for each performance category <br />listed on the Executive Evaluation Sheet: <br /> <br />Outstanding: Performance is well above the normal standards for this position. Score with a <br />numerical score of 4.5 - 5.0. <br /> <br />Very Good: Performance is usually above competent performance in the specific job <br />responsibility or criteria. Score with a numerical score of 3.5 - 4.4. <br /> <br />Good: Employee consistently demonstrates competent performance in the specific job <br />responsibility or criteria. Score with a numerical score of 2.5 - 3.4. <br /> <br />Below Average: Performance periodically or regularly falls short of normal standards. The <br />evaluation indicates the evaluator's belief the employee can and will make necessary improvements <br />in this performance category. Score with a numerical score of 1.5 - 2.4. <br /> <br />Unsatisfactory: Performance is clearly inadequate. Employee has demonstrqted an inability or <br />unwillingness to improve or to meet standard performance levels. Score with a numerical score <br />of 1.0 - 1.4. <br /> <br />Evaluation forms should be completed by each individual Council Person, 'following careful <br />individual consideration, and before the formal evaluation meeting, without collaboration with other <br />Council Persons in any way. <br /> <br />In the event an evaluation of 2.4 or less is given in any specific performan~e category. the <br />evaluator must indicate bv comments in the lines following that criteria specific int3tances iustifving <br />the low evaluation and suggested actions to improve the evaluation. <br /> <br />After the Executive Performance Evaluation Sheet is completed by each Council Person the <br />Performance Evaluation Overview must be completed to determine the composite average in each <br />performance category and the overall Average Composite Evaluation Rating. <br /> <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.