2009-071-RES-City of Paris received a proposal from Hayter Eng. for services for plans for the Main Street sidewalk

Home Browse Search

2.5.3 Iiiterpretations and Clarifications ENGINEER shall issue necessary interpretations and clarifications of the contract documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive changes and change orders, as required. 2.5.4 Silop Drawings & Substitutes E`:I~GINEER shall review or take appropriate action, on substitute materials proposed by CONTRACTOR, shop drawings, samples and other data which CONTRACTOR is required to submit, but only for general conformance with the design concept of the project and the information given in the contract documents. Such review shall not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. 2.5.5 Inspections and Tests ENGINEER shall have authority, as CITY'S representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work, and shall receive and review all cei-tificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, regulations, codes, orders or the contract documents, to de~ermine generally that their content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the contract documents. 2.5.6 Disputes between CITY and CONTRACTOR ENGINEER shall act as initial interpreter of the contract documents and judge of the acceptability of the work, and make decisions on all claims of CITY and CONTRACTOR relating to the acceptability of the work or the interpretation of the requirements of the contract documents. ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such intorpretations or decisions rendered in good faith. 2.5.7 Apolications for Payment Based on ENGINEER'S observations as an experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the on-site observer and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedules; ENGINEER shall determine the amount owed to CONTRACTOR and recommend in writing payments to CONTRACTOR. This recommendation will constitute a representation to CITY that the woik has progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of ENGINEER'S kitcwlccige, iiifurmation and beliel', the quality of such work is generally in accordance witll the contract documents. However, ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have macie exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations to check the quality or qua:Itity of CONTRACTOR'S work as it is furnished, beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in this Agreement and the contract documents.