Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> MCCLANAHAN AND HOLMES, LLP <br /> R. FRANK RAY, CPA CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 228 SIXTH STREET, S.E. <br /> R. E. BOSTWICK, CPA PARIS, TEXAS 75460 <br /> STEVEN W. MOHUNDRO, CPA 903-784-4316 <br /> GEORGE H. STRUVE, CPA FAX 903-784-4310 <br /> ANDREW B. REICH, CPA 304 WEST CHESTNUT <br /> RUSSELL P. WOOD, CPA DENISON, TEXAS 75020 <br /> 903-465-6070 <br /> FAX 903-465-6093 <br /> 1400 WEST RUSSELL <br /> BONHAM, TEXAS 75418 <br /> 903-583-5574 <br /> FAX 903-583-9453 <br /> Independent Auditors' Report Board of Directors <br /> Paris Economic Development Corporation <br /> Paris, Texas <br /> We have audited the acco anying financial statements of Paris Economic Development Corporation (PEDC), a <br /> component unit of the City of Paris, Texas, as of and for the year ended September 30, 2009, as listed in the table of <br /> contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of PEDC's management. Our responsibility is to express <br /> an opinion on these financia statements based on our audit. <br /> We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. <br /> Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the <br /> financial statements are fre of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence <br /> supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting <br /> principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement <br /> presentation. We believe that our audit provides us with a reasonable basis for our opinion. <br /> In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position <br /> of PEDC as of September 0, 2009, and the results of its activities for the year then ended in conformity with <br /> accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. <br /> Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The <br /> Continuing Disclosure Info ation is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the <br /> financial statements. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the <br /> financial statements, and accordingly, we express no opinion on it. <br /> The budgetary comparison information on Page 9 is not a required part of the financial statements but is <br /> supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. <br /> We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the <br /> methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit <br /> the information and express no opinion on it. <br /> PEDC has not presented Management's Discussion and Analysis which accounting principles generally accepted in <br /> the United States of America has determined is necessary to supplement, although not required to be part of, the <br /> financial statements. <br /> <br /> Certified Public Accountants <br /> <br /> February 2, 2010 <br /> Paris, Texas <br /> <br /> <br /> 1 <br /> AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS <br />