My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/22/2010 Special Meeting
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2010
>
04 April
>
04/22/2010 Special Meeting
>
04/22/2010 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2012 3:34:52 PM
Creation date
4/16/2010 3:51:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
04/22/2010
Doc Type
Agenda
CITY CLERK - Date
4/22/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
215. Finding o( Viotation; Penaities; Injunctive Relief. <br />To discuss penalties and other relief, click here. <br />1. Disciplinary Action. <br />Within thirty days after the last hearing, the Ethics Commission will determine whether to dismiss the complaint or, upon a find ng <br />of a violation of this code, to take appropriate disciplinary action pursuant to 107 of this code, or to recommend disciplinary ac ion <br />to the legislative body in circumstances where such action is required by 107(2) or by this section. <br />2. Finding a Violation. <br />A finding of a violation of this code requires the affirmative vote of three members of the Ethics Commission that there is clear <br />convincing evidence that the respondent has violated this code. Any member not present at all public hearings and deliberatic <br />may not vote. The written final decision must specify the code sections violated and provide a factual explanation supporting f <br />violation or, if no violation is found, findings of fact and the reasons for dismissal. When determining the appropriate penalty, t <br />following should be considered: the severity of the respondent's offense; the po~ition and responsibilities of the respondent; tF <br />presence or absence of any intention on the part of the respondent to conceal, deceive, or mislead; whether the violation was <br />deliberate, negligent, or inadvertent; and whether the incident was isolated or part of a pattern. The Ethics Commission must 1 <br />its memorandum of decision with the City Clerk, and send it to the complainant and respondent, within ten days after it votes. <br />Comment: "Clear and convincing evidence" is only one possible basis on which to find a violation. Please provide informatior <br />about other bases and your feelings about and experiences with ihem. <br />3. Reprimand or Civil Fine <br />The Ethics Commission, on behalf of the city, may reprimand any person or entity it finds has violated this code, or it may imp <br />on such person or entity a civil fine as provided in subsections 2 and 3 af 107 of this code. <br />4. Damages. <br />The Ethics Commission, on behalf of the city, may initiate an action in the court of appropriate jurisdiction to obtain damages, <br />provided in subsectian 4 of 107 of this code. <br />5. Civil Forfeiture. <br />The Ethics Commission, on behalf of the city, may initiate an action or special proceeding, as appropriate, in the court of <br />appropriate jurisdiction to obtain civil forfeiture, as provided in subsection 5 of 107 of this code. <br />6. Injunctive Relief. <br />The Ethics Commission, on behalf of the city, may order a violator to cease and desist the violation if the violation is still ongo <br />or it may initiate an action or special proceeding, as appropriate, in the court of appropriate jurisdiction for injunctive relief to e <br />a violation of this code or to compel compliance with this code. The Ethics Commission may also order a violator of a disclosL <br />requirement to file an unfiled disclosure statement or to add information to a filed disclosure statement. <br />7. Suspension and Removal from Office. <br />The Ethics Commission may suspend or remove a respondent from office, or employ other sanctions or remedies authorized <br />law or collective bargaining agreement not listed in this section or in 107. <br />Comment: See comments to 107(2) for two alternative approached to suspension and removal from office, as well as commi <br />re union and civil service conflicts. <br />8. Prosecutions. <br />The Ethics Commission may refer possible criminal violations to the appropriate prosecutor. Nothing contained in this code <br />be construed to restrict the authority of any prosecutor to prosecute any violation of this code or of any other law. <br />9. Debarment. <br />To discuss this and other penalties relating to contracts, click here. <br />If the Ethics Commission finds that a person or entity has intentionally or knowingly violated any provision of this code, that <br />or entity is prohibited from entering into any contract with the city for a period not to exceed three years, pursuant to 108 of <br />code. <br />10. Limit on Ethics Commission. <br />Nothing in this section may be construed to permit the Ethics Commission to take any action with respect to any alleged viola ion <br />of this code, or of any other law, by the Commission or by any of its members or full-time staff members. <br />11. Penalties imposed by the Ethics Commission are exclusive of, and not affected by, each other or any other penalties imp sed <br />pursuant other laws or policies. <br />Comment: Some cities require their ethics commissions to file suits through the city attorney's office. The problem with this <br />approach is that it brings a political element into enforcement by allow the city attorney's office to choose whether or not to fil a <br />suit or, if it does, to determine how to proceed and the amount of resources to devote to the matter. Since the city attorney is <br />generally appointed and supervised by an individual or body that often has a special interest in the outcome of the matter, th city <br />attorney often has a conflict of interest: does he or she act in the interests of a supervisor (Ioyalty and self-interest) or in the p blic <br />interest (pursuing violators of the ethics code, but not for political reasons). It is better for the ethics commission to work throu h <br />counsel that is working for it alone. <br />216. Judicial Review. <br />To discuss this section, click here. <br />Any person or entity aggrieved by a decision of the Ethics Commission may seek judicial review and relief pursuant to <br />(state law]. <br />56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.