14-Deliberate and possibly act on ordinance approving the nnegotiated gas rates between the City of Paris and Atmos Energy Mid-Tex Division

Home Browse Search

ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION MID-TEX DIVISION Ezhibit A to Settlement Agreement Attachment A to Ordinance RIDER: RRM - RATE REVIEW MECHANISM APPLICABLE TO: All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas EFFECTIVE DATE: Bills Rendered on or after 10/0112010 c) Notwithstanding the limitations in subparts IV (a) through (b) of this tariff, the Company shall be entitled to separately adjust rates for the Rate Effeative Period to include recovery for direct incremental costs associated with a steel service line replacement program incurred on and after October 1, 2010, a return on equity of 9.0% for such incremental costs as capitalized, depreciation, and applicable taxes. Capital structure will be the actual Evaluation Period ratio of long-term debt and equity, with percentage equity not to exceed 50%, based on the calculation methodology outcomes used above. Rate recovery associated with a steel service (ine replacement program shall be recovered through the Residential and Commercial customer charges and shall not be subject to or included in the rate increase limitations set forth in IV (a) through (b) of this tariff. Current year recovery factors are presumed to be $0.15 for residential customers and $0.41 for commercial customers. The rates will be adjusted annually, however, in no case will the per customer monthly cost recovery factors attributable to a steel service line replacement program exceed $0.44 for residential customers or $1.22 for commercial customers, prior to or during the pendency of the Company's next Statement of Intent case. Moreover, the per customer amount attributable to cost recovery for a steel service line replacement program shall be subject to review by the regulatory authority in a subsequent Evaluation Period and all costs associated with a steel service line replacement program will be subject to a prudence/reasonableness review in the Company's next Statement of Intent rate case. d) The Company shall provide a schedule demonstrating the "proof of revenues" relied upon ta calculate the proposed rate for the Rate Effective Period. The proposed rates shall conform as clasely as is practicable to the revenue allocation principles approved in the Final Order. V. Attestation A swom statement shall be filed by the Company's Chief Officer in Charge of Mid-Tex Operations affirming that the filed schedules are in compliance with the provisions of this mechanism and are true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge, information and belief. No testimony shall be filed, but a brief narrative explanation sha(I be provided of any changes to corporate structure or allocation of common costs. VI. Evaluation Procedures The regulatory authority having original jurisdiction over the Company's rates shall have no less than ninety (90) days to review the Company's filed schedules and work papers. The Company will be prepared to provide all supplemental information as may be requested to ensure adequate review by the relevant regulatory authority. The Company shall not unilaterally impose any limits upon the provision of supplemental information and such information shall be provided within ten (10) working days of the original request The regulatory authority may propose any adjustments it determines to be required to bring the schedules into compliance with the above provisions. During and following the ninety (90) day review period and a thirty (30) day response period, the Company and the regulatory authority will work collaboratively and seek agreement on, the proposed adjustments to the Company's schedule and proposed rates. If agreement has been reached by the Company and the regulatory authority, the regulatory authority shall authorize an increase or decrease to the Company's rates so as to achieve the revenue levels indicated for the Rate Effective Period. If, at the end of the thirty (30) day response period, the Company and the regulatory authority have not reached agreement on the proposed adjustments, the Company shall have the right to appeal the regulatory authority's action or inaction to the Railroad Commission of Texas. Upon the filing of any appeal, the Company shall have the right to implement the proposed RRM rate adjustment, including the adjustment attributable to steel service line replacement program costs, subject to refund. 140