14-Deliberate and possibly act on ordinance approving the nnegotiated gas rates between the City of Paris and Atmos Energy Mid-Tex Division

Home Browse Search

Attachment C to Ordinance according to Chapters 103 and 104, TEX. UTIL. CODE ANN. Further, in the event of such appeal(s), Atmos shall recover any reimbursement made to the original jurisdiction entity through a surcharge to a11 customer rates that are subject to the Commission's jurisdiction in that proceeding or proceedings that might be joined therewith, regardless of whether such reimbursements are made during the initial review period or appeal period. The ACSC Cities agree that they will not challenge the legal basis of the rates, terms, and conditions reflected in Exhibit A, or any annual RRM adjustment that is implemented pursuant to Rider RRM. 10. Atmos and the ACSC Cities further agree that the express terms of the Rider RRM are supplemental to the filing, notice, regulatory review, or appellate procedural process of the ratemaking provisions of Chapter 104 of the Texas Utilities Code. If the statute requires a mandatory action on behalf of the municipal regulatory authoriiy or Atmos, the parties will follow the provisions of such statute. If the statute allows discretion on behalf of the municipal regulatory authority, the ACSC Cities agree that they shall exercise such discretion in such a way as to implement the provisions of the RRM tariff. If Atmos appeals an action or inaction of an ACSC City regarding an RRM filing to the Railroad Commission, the ACSC Cities agee that they will not oppose the implementation of interim rates or advacate the imposition of a bond by Atmos consistent with the RRM tariff. Atnaos agrees tha.t it will ma.ke no filings on behalf of its Mid-Tex division under the provisions of T'Ex. UTIL. CODE ANN. § 104.301 while the Rider RRM is in place. In the event that a regulatory authority fails to act or enters an adverse decision regarding the proposed annual RRM adjustment, the Raikoad Commission of Texas shall, pursuant to the provisions of the Texas Utilities Code, have exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review the action or inaction of the regulatory authority exercising exclusive original jurisdiction over the RRM request. In addition, the Signatories agree that this Settlement Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the ACSC Cities' right to initiate a show cause proceeding or the Company's right to file a Statement of Intent under the provisions of the Texas Utilities Code. 11. Atmos and ACSC further agree that the ordinance or resolution adopting this Settlement Agreement shall include a provision authorizing Atmos to establish regulatory asset account(s) for costs related to working gas in storage. Atmos and ACSC further agree that the language authorizing these regulatory asset account(s) shall be the same as that set forth in the 4th Ordering Paragraph (Page 10 of 11) of the Final Order Nunc Pro Tunc issued by Railroad Commission of Texas in GUD No. 9869 on Februazy 23, 2010. This language states as follows: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Atmos shall be allowed to establish a regulatory asset for the ad valorem taates related to working gas in storage. In addition, Atmos shall be allowed to establish a regulatory asset for (1) the costs associated with Accumulated Deferred Income Tax for LJNICAP Section 263A, (2) the WACOG to FIFO change, and (3) a.n amount equal to the rate of return approved in this RRM Proceeding for the Accurnulated Deferred Income Tax items related to working gas in storage. Atmos shall record these amounts in Other Regulatory Assets (Account 182.3). These deferred items shall be considered, along with the 4 150