Laserfiche WebLink
Eghibit A to Settlement Agreement <br />Attachment A to Ordinance <br />ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION <br />MID-TEX DIVISION <br />RIDER: <br />RRM - RATE REVIEW MECHANISM <br />APPLICABLE TO: <br />All Cities except the City of Dallas and all unincorporated areas - <br />EFFECTIVE DATE: <br />Bills Rendered on or after 1010112010 <br />Effective Period will be established by using the Evaluation Period ending balances, including <br />associated changes in depreciation and amortization expense and taxes. In calculating the <br />Company's known and measurable changes for prospective RRM adjustment purposes, the <br />following limitations will apply, on a Per Connection Basis. <br />1. Operating and Maintenance expenses per connection for the Rate Effective Period <br />cannot increase more than 5% per year without specific identification and justification. <br />Any proposed adjustment above 5% per year, is subject to the provisions of the <br />Evaluation Procedures of this tariff. Such procedures provide that the regulatory <br />authority will review the proposed adjustment and that the Company and regulatory <br />authority will work collaboratively to seek agreement on the proposed adjustments to the <br />Company's schedules and proposed rates. Justification for such expenditures over the <br />cap shall include an event or combination of events beyond the control of the Company. <br />The beginning adjusted Operation and Maintenance expense per connection for the 2007 <br />RRM Evaluation Period will be limited to not exceed $151 million divided by the <br />connections for the period. The increase in adjusted Operation and Maintenance <br />expenses per connection for the 2008 Rate Effective Period and the subsequent Rate <br />Effective periods cannot exceed 5% per year, without specific identification and <br />justification <br />2. Net plant investment per connection for the Rate Effective Period cannot increase more <br />than 5% per year without specific identification and justification. Any proposed <br />adjustment above 5% per year, is subject to the provisions of the Evaluation Procedures <br />of this tariff. Such procedures provide that the regulatory authority will review the <br />proposed adjustment and that the Company and regulatory authority will work <br />collaboratively to seek agreement on the proposed adjustments to the Company's <br />schedules and proposed rates. However, in performing a cap test to verify compliance, <br />the Company shall exclude any changes in net plant investment associated with federal, <br />state, or local mandates related to safety, compliance, or road moves, including steel <br />service line replacement program costs incurred prior to October 1, 2010. The initial <br />2008 rate will be set using net plant limited to not exceed [$1,243,607,206 divided by <br />average active meters for the 12 months ended June 30 2007] times 1.025 times the <br />average active meters for calendar year 2007. Subsequent filing calculations of net plant <br />investment will be made using the same method used in the Company's September 20, <br />2007 Statement of Intent except that Evaluation Period ending balances will be used for <br />net plant in the calculation of rates for the Rate Effective Period. <br />The rate increase limitations set forth in this tariff shall not preclude the Company ftom <br />recovering any excluded net plant costs during a subsequent Evaluation Period in which <br />the 5% limitation for net plant investment is not reached or in a subsequent Statement of <br />Intent case. To the extent that the Company seeks to recover any excluded net plant <br />costs during a subsequent Evaluation Period in which the 5% limitation for net plan# <br />investment is not reached or in a subsequent Statement of Intent case, the Company <br />shall identify these costs as a specific line item in the schedule accompanying the RRM <br />rate adjustment filing. <br />The regulatory authority may disallow any net plant investment that is not shown to be <br />prudently incurred. Approval by the regulatory authoriry of net plant investment pursuant <br />to the provisions of this tariff shall constitute a finding that such net plant investment was <br />prudently incurred. Such finding of prudence shall not be subject to further review in a <br />subsequent Evaluation Period or Statement af Intent filing. <br />