My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-Adopting criteria for redistricting og political boundaries
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2011
>
06 June
>
06/09/2011
>
05-Adopting criteria for redistricting og political boundaries
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2011 7:56:29 AM
Creation date
6/7/2011 7:56:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
05
Doc Type
Agenda
CITY CLERK - Date
6/6/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ORDER <br /> <br /> AN ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR <br /> REDISTRICTING OF CITY POLITICAL BOUNDARIES <br /> <br /> The City Council of the City of Paris, Texas, meeting in a duly scheduled and posted meeting, does <br /> hereby adopt the following criteria for use in the redistricting of all city political boundaries. Any plan for <br /> the redistricting of the City of Paris, or election precincts should, to the maximum extent possible, conform <br /> to the following criteria: <br /> <br /> 1. The plan should insure that all applicable provisions of the U.S. and Texas Constitutions, the Voting <br /> Rights Act, the Texas Election Code are honored. <br /> <br /> 2. The plan should address minority representation, and if at all possible in conformity with <br /> constitutional standards, avoid retrogression in the percentage of population and voting age <br /> demographics consistent with existing minority representation. <br /> <br /> 3. The plan should preserve minority communities of interest. These communities of interest should be <br /> recognized and retained intact where possible. Only when the overall minority population of the <br /> City is sufficiently large, should the City require more than one minority district, should minority <br /> populations be divided and only then to the least degree possible. <br /> <br /> 4. The plan should not, however, attempt to unreasonably join geographically remote minority populations <br /> into a single precinct unless there are strong and genuine connections between these communities as <br /> reflected by common schools, churches, or cultural ties. For example, minority populations in two <br /> separate towns, located miles apart, may not have sufficient links or common political cohesion to <br /> justify joining these two minority population centers into a single electoral group. Particularly when <br /> dealing with distinct minority groups, such as Black and Hispanic populations, a general assumption <br /> that separate minority populations will vote in a "block" may be unsupportable in fact. <br /> 5. The plan should seek compact and contiguous political boundaries. Physical boundaries such as <br /> rivers, which tend to divide populations in fundamental ways, should be recognized and communities of <br /> interest should be retained intact where possible. To the maximum extent possible, clearly recognized <br /> boundaries should be used to facilitate ease of voter identification of boundaries, as well as election <br /> administration. <br /> <br /> 6. Where possible, well-recognized and long used election precinct boundaries should be retained intact <br /> (within the limitations imposed by state and federal law) or with as little alteration as possible. <br /> <br /> 7. Election precincts in the plans should be sized in conformity with state law. For example, in cities that <br /> use traditional, hand counted paper ballots, no election precinct may contain more than 2000 voters. In <br /> cities with voting systems that allow for automated ballot counting, this number may be increased to as <br /> many as 5000 voters. <br /> <br /> 8. The plan should afford incumbent office holders with the assurance that they will continue to <br /> represent the majority of individuals who elected these incumbents, and all incumbents' residential <br /> locations should be retained in their reformed precincts to insure continuity in leadership during the <br /> remaining term of incumbents. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> EXHIBIT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.