Laserfiche WebLink
ORDER <br />AN ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARIS ESTABLISHING CRITERIA FOR <br />REDISTRICTING OF CITY POLITICAL BOLTNDARIES <br />The City Council of the City of Paris, Texas, meeting in a duly scheduled and posted meeting, does <br />hereby adopt the following criteria for use in the redistricting of all city political boundaries. Any plan for <br />the redistricting of the City of Paris, or election precincts should, to the maximum extent possible, conform <br />to the following criteria: <br />The plan should insure that all applicable provisions of the U.S. and Texas Constitutions, the <br />Voting Rights Act, the Texas Election Code are honored. <br />2. The plan should address minarity representation, and if at all possible in conformity with <br />constitutional standards, avoid retrogression in the percentage of population and voting age <br />demographics consistent with existing minority representation. <br />The plan should preserve minority communities of interest. These communities of interest should <br />be recognized and retained intact where possible. Only when the overall minority population of <br />the City is sufficiently large, should the City require more than one minority district, should <br />minority populations be divided and only then to the least degree possible. <br />4. The plan should not, however, attempt to unreasonably join geographically remote minority <br />populations into a single precinct unless there are strong and genuine connections between these <br />communities as reflected by common schools, churches, or cultural ties. For example, minority <br />populations in two separate towns, located miles apart, may not have sufficient links or common <br />political cohesion to justify joining these two minority population centers into a single electaral group. <br />Particularly when dealing with distinct minority groups, such as Black and Hispanic populations, a <br />general assumption that separate minority populations will vote in a"block" may be unsupportable in <br />fact. <br />The plan should seek compact and contiguous political boundaries. Physical boundaries such as <br />rivers, which tend to divide populations in fundamental ways, should be recognized and communities <br />of interest should be retained intact where possible. To the maximum extent possible, clearly <br />recognized boundaries should be used to facilitate ease of voter identification of boundaries, as well as <br />election administration. <br />6. Where possible, well-recognized and long used election precinct boundaries should be retained intact <br />(within the limitations imposed by state and federal law) or with as little alteration as possible. <br />7. Election precincts in the plans should be sized in conformity with state law. For example, in cities <br />that use traditional, hand counted paper ballots, no election precinct may contain more than 2000 <br />voters. In cities with voting systems that allow for automated ballot counting, this number may be <br />increased to as many as 5000 voters. <br />The plan should afford incumbent office holders with the assurance that they will continue to <br />represent tlle majority of individuals who elected these incumbents, and all incumbents' residential <br />locations should be retained in their reformed precincts to insure continuity in leadership during the <br />remaining term of incumbents. <br />~Y~+1t31T ~ <br />