My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-APPROVE ORDINANCE ADOPTING REDISTRICTING PLAN
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2011
>
09 September
>
09/12/2011
>
08-APPROVE ORDINANCE ADOPTING REDISTRICTING PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 4:22:06 PM
Creation date
9/12/2011 8:50:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TAB 1 <br />GENERAL OVERVIEW <br />The Initial Assessment is a narrative analysis of the data contained in the PL94- <br />171 files provided by the Census Bureau, together with an explanation ofthe impact such <br />data inay have upon the City of Paris in light of state and federal law. <br />Following the Supreme Court decision in Avery v. Midlarrd City, 390 U.S. 474; 88 S. <br />Ct. 1114.1 20 L. Ed. 2d 45 (1968), Texas City Councils have been required to make a <br />periodic assessment of their political boundaries to determine whether the boundaries retain <br />"one-person-one-vote" balance. This requirement is now carried forward by statutory <br />requirement in Article 42.001 of the Texas Election Code, and has been extended in turn to <br />virtually all political bodies that elect representatives from special member districts, or <br />geographic regioiis of the political jurisdiction in which the candidates for representative <br />office must reside. <br />Therefore, following each federal census, each Texas County, city, school district or <br />other political entity electing representative officers from geographic regions of the sub- <br />division should conduct an assessinent of existing political boundaries. [t should be <br />carefully noted that simple comparisons between the City population of 2000 and 2010, or <br />even a more sophisticated analysis of the urban and less populated areas of the City might <br />not reflect the true extent of population "change" each City has experienced over the last ten <br />years. "Change" may not directly correlate to "different" or "new" population. For <br />example, existing populations within a City will, over time, move considerably within the <br />City, rendering existing political boundaries constitutionally questionable over a ten-year <br />span. In small population jurisdictions, the movement ofi a single large family from a one <br />area of town to another across political boundaries may have a significant impact on the <br />obligation of that City to redistrict. As a very general rule of thumb, any statistical change <br />of population between the 2000 and 2010 census more than 3%, plus or minus, will indicate <br />a potential need for redistricting in order to retain numerical balance between the governing <br />body's representative districts. Only in rare circumstances will a City experiencing a <br />population chaiige in excess of 3% avoid the need for rather extensive reapportionment of <br />the City Council ward lines. However, any assumption that a population change of less than <br />3% will not require reapportionment is ill advised. Populations will shift within a City over <br />time. Every City, city, school district or other political entity electing representative officers <br />from geographic regions of the sub-division, even those with a rather insignificant overall <br />population change, should carefully examine actual population demographics relative to <br />their existing political lines to determine the need for reapportionment. <br />Demographic data is depicted in chart and graphic form for both total population as <br />well as voting age population. While "One-Person-0ne-Vote" balance between the City <br />Council Wards is based upon the entire City population, the availability of voting age <br />populations is also important in two respects. <br />Initial Assessment <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.