Laserfiche WebLink
Final Report <br />City of Paris, Tezas <br />Wastewater Collection System Capacity Analysis <br />combinations of replacement and rehabilitation that results in the least cost for the <br />scenarios evaluated. <br />Derivation of Cost Estimates <br />To develop the costs associated with replacement pipes, a table was developed which <br />reviewed the open cut construction costs for several communities in Texas. The cost for <br />each replacement section was based on the average depth of the segment and the <br />replacement pipe diameter. These estimates are of a general order of magnitude and only <br />a detailed pre-engineering study could recommend specific pipe diameters, depths and <br />distances required to alleviate restrictions. Estimated diameter increases that were less <br />than 6 inches were not considered in the estimates provided. <br />Costs to rehabilitate the defects that were observed were prepared by ADS <br />Environmental Services based on years of accumulated rehabilitation construction costs. <br />It is important to note that none of these costs in this report include design and project <br />administration costs. <br />Results <br />In general, the overall capacity of the system is good. There are a few areas that appear <br />to have inadequate capacity even during dry weather. These are areas with extremely <br />low slopes and include the downstream end of Basins 13 and 30. If there are many <br />observed overflow and backup complaints during dry weather this is most likely related <br />to local maintenance problems. <br />Based on the Design Event and No Rehabilitation Scenazio, there are 279 line segments <br />out of approximately 2500 that are predicted to have inadequate capacity. Of these only <br />87 line segments required upsizing by six inches or more. By performing rehabilitation <br />in only the Top 5 basins this number is reduced to 62 pipe segments. The combined cost <br />reduction is from $7.48 million dollars to $6.92 million dollars. <br />Based on the four rehabilitation and replacement programs evaluated, the costs for each <br />program was calculated and recommendations made for the lowest cost program which <br />was the Top 5 program. In this scenario all defects should be repaired in the Top 5 <br />basins. <br />Reverse Slope Pipe Segments <br />Note that in the investigation of the system, there were 22 pipes that were reported <br />through a combination of GPS and field depth measurements to have adverse or reverse <br />slopes. That is the downstream invert elevation is higher than the upstream elevation. <br />Pipe segments in these configurations behave somewhat like siphons and aze likely to <br />create maintenance problems. For these reasons, a listing of the pipes and their <br />recommended sizes and costs are included following the Basin Summaries. The <br />15 <br />