Laserfiche WebLink
Final Report <br />City of Paris, Texas <br />Wastewater Collection System Capacity Analysis <br />system investment program was identified. As shown above, rehabilitation of the Top 5 <br />ranked basins combined with the associated replacements results in a restoration of <br />hydraulic capacity for the predicted design event. <br />It is recommended that the City commence with the rehabilitation program described in <br />the following sections. Further the City should consider the use of post-rehabilitation <br />flow monitoring to determine the overall effectiveness of the program and to update and <br />calibrate the model. The City should also pursue an aggressive maintenance program to <br />minimize local conditions that are not revealed by the model. <br />Tools and Techniques <br />This section describes the overall accumulation of data for the model as well as the <br />techniques used to analyze the data. This section is followed by the results section and <br />the basin summaries. <br />Sources of Data <br />In the modeling of collection systems, the primary representations are those for flow and <br />for the piping system. Each of these aspects of the model comes from several sources. <br />The following paragraphs describe how the information was accumulated and integrated <br />to provide an overall model of the collection system. Any assumptions that were made <br />are also described in this section. <br />Flow Metering <br />A temporary flow monitoring program was conducted for the City by ADS <br />Environmental Services in 1996. In this portion of the program, flow measuring devices <br />were installed throughout the system. These devices measured the flow in the sewers <br />throughout the monitoring period. The monitoring period included both dry and wet <br />weather conditions. This allows the system to be evaluated for system responses to <br />stressed conditions created by rainfall. Rain gauges were also installed throughout the <br />system to accurately measure the rainfall that fell in different areas of the system. This <br />data was used to determine the operations of the system in both normal dry weather <br />conditions as well as in stressed, wet weather conditions. These flows are subsequently <br />used as the basis for determining the capacity of the system. <br />Analysis <br />While the data sets created from the flow monitoring process are useful, additional <br />quantitative analyses of the data provided more valuable insights into how the system is <br />currently operating (1996). A baseline of performance was established by defining the <br />Average Dry Day flow patterns for each meter location. Once defined, this is used as the <br />basis to quantify what occurs in the system during a"stressed" state. This section <br />discusses the components of flow and the design storm projections. <br />5 <br />