Laserfiche WebLink
October 14, 2002 <br />Page 20 of 35 <br />In starting on page six we go through the notice provisions. The notice provision can <br />be extensive and I will not bore you with all of the details of them but this is <br />basically out of the state statute. This is not my creation. Not a whole lot of any sort <br />of thought on my part because this is basically what the state statute is requiring us <br />to do if we want to do this with somebody's property. That is true continuing over <br />the page seven and page eight; filing notices; checking the records; it is so detailed <br />that it goes in to what happens if the notice is refused or unclaimed. And then on <br />page eight under item (7), it says, " after a hearing on an affected property the <br />commission shall reduce any order or condition to writing." What we will probably <br />try to generate for you are some forms to use in advance of you having your orders <br />issued but it is not only important but it is mandatory that you issue an order for <br />repair; to issue an order for demolition; you issue an order for a property to be <br />secured and it must be in writing. <br />Secondly, under paragraph (7), and very importantly, this is an ordinance that <br />anticipates prompt action. So it provides that there is a thirty (30) day window for <br />a property owner to comply, unless they meet a higher burden set out in the <br />ordinance that in your judgment justifies them having a longer period of time. I <br />know this is one of the complaints under our old ordinances was that orders would <br />be issued and linger for six months to a year and nothing was happening. That is not <br />the intent of this particular ordinance. When a property has an order rendered <br />against it, that property better have some good reasons for you to consider why they <br />can't comply within a thirty (30) day window in order for you to be empowered to <br />give them more time. And finally under paragraph (8), "the commission shall not <br />allow the owner, lienholder, or mortgagee more than ninety (90) calendar days to <br />repair, remove or demolish the building or fully perform all work required to comply <br />with the order unless the owner, lienholder or mortgagee submits a detailed plan and <br />time schedule for the work at the hearing and establishes at the hearing that the work <br />cannot reasonably be completed within ninety (90) days because of the scope and <br />complexity of the work." So this is not a"we will wait around and give you time" <br />ordinance. If it comes to you it comes to you because it is pretty bad shape because <br />nobody has cared. And that is the message we are trying to send through this and <br />that is the message the legislature sends. The rest of it deals again with more notice <br />provisions; how those orders are sent; the calendar dates that deal with that. <br />I think under page ten you have a general recitation of the authority of the <br />commission to declare a building dangerous or substandard; order it secured; order <br />it demolished or removed; order it repaired; or in the appropriate case order the <br />immediate vacation of persons and the immediate removal of property. And of <br />course, again, I emphasize again that people who don't belong there because it is an <br />occupied building shouldn't come to you in the first place. <br />And on the next page, page eleven, it also provides for you to, in the appropriate <br />circumstance, impose up to a thousand dollar per day civil penalty for violation of <br />