My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-E Hist Pres.Comm. (10/14/02)
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
07 - July
>
2004-07-12
>
03-E Hist Pres.Comm. (10/14/02)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2012 3:37:11 PM
Creation date
6/30/2004 9:07:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
Historic Preservation Commission
AGENDA - Date
10/14/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 14, 2002 <br />Page 30 of 35 <br />Ms. Pope: Will the Main Street board be providing an advisory role in the establishment of a <br />historic district? <br />Mr. Schenk: Say again. <br />Ms. Pope: Will the Main Street board be providing an advisory role in the establishment of the <br />historic district? <br />Mr. Schenk: That is not provided for in the ordinance. A representative from the Main Street <br />board is on the commission. <br />Ms. Pope: Okay. <br />Mr. Denney: And it is a public meeting? <br />Several discussions going on for about 30 seconds. <br />Ms. Pope: I would just like to know what role they will have because they have been <br />working for so many years with the national districts. <br />Mr. Schenk: I think that is a matter again for the chairman of that commission to decide <br />information. I see this as a proceeding. These proceedings are going to be much <br />more broad ranging. You will want to receive input from any and all parties who <br />have something to say about what you deliberate at the time. Because, the <br />importance of this particular ordinance is to get a consensus of the community as to <br />what they want saved and what they don't want saved and the price to be paid by the <br />property owner or by someone else for doing that. So these meetings ought to be <br />big. <br />The Buildings and Standards Commission meetings, when they get rolling on an <br />individual case, could be limited to no more than the staff person, the commission, <br />the interested property owner and maybe a neighbor or two saying I want that thing <br />going down, yesterday. <br />Mr. Malone: The Preservation Commission will get lots of input. <br />Mr. Schenk: Yes. Any other questions? <br />Mr. Starrett: Attrition aside or changes of ownership or subsequent demolition aside, I would <br />really think that the survey done that Paul was referring to is probably the best basis <br />for this commission to begin their work in that all of those properties were made as <br />a recommendation to the national trust. <br />Mr. Denney: I agree with you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.