My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02 Council Minutes July 8, 2004
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
08 - August
>
2004-08-09
>
02 Council Minutes July 8, 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2012 4:45:49 PM
Creation date
8/4/2004 1:55:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
02 July 8, 2004
AGENDA - Type
MINUTES
Description
City Council Minutes 7-8-04
AGENDA - Date
8/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />July 8, 2004 <br />Page 11 <br />Resolution No. 2004-116, authorizing the execution of Deeds of Abandonment <br />to the adj acent property owners of a 120 foot wide street right-of-way, being <br />a portion of 13th Street S. W. abandoned by Ordinance No. 2004-018 from the <br />north right-of-way line of Loop 286 S. W. going north approximately 1,713,1 <br />feet to and including a cul-de-sac; making other findings and provisions <br />related to the subject; and providing an effective dated, was presented. A <br />motion was made by Councilman Bell, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Guest, for <br />approval of the resolution. The motion carried 7 ayes, 0 nays. <br />Mayor Fendley advised that the next item on the agenda was discussion and <br />consideration of possible direction to city staff for the proposed 2004-2005 <br />City Budget. <br />City Attorney Schenk said he had the first working draft of a calendar for <br />adopting the budget and what they will do is fill in some of the blanks on it. <br />Councilman Bell said he was still having problems, as he did last year, of <br />looking at an audit and this budget and numbers that do not match. He said <br />that he realizes that it was done under the GASBY. <br />Gene Anderson, Director of Finance, said the problem in trying to reconcile <br />those two is the audit is done on a full accrual basis and the budget is a cash <br />basis document. So, they are never going to be the same. He said you could <br />do a reconciliation on it, but he did not feel you would gain anything by doing <br />that because when you do an accrual, you are backing out some cash flow <br />numbers that occurred in your fiscal year, but belong in the year before. There <br />was just a delay in collection or expenditure and then you are estimating some <br />revenues and expenses that occurred in the last month of the fiscal year but <br />were not actually paid or received until the following fiscal month. He said <br />the differences in those reconciliations is the primarily reason for a difference <br />in a cash budget and the audited numbers. Mr. Anderson stated that there are <br />always going to be some differences there and he does not know any city that <br />budgets on a full accrual basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.