My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02 Auditor Appointment
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2004
>
08 - August
>
2004-08-16
>
02 Auditor Appointment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2005 11:15:11 AM
Creation date
8/13/2004 10:09:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
02 Auditor Appt
AGENDA - Type
MISCELLANEOUS
Description
Auditor Appointment for year ending 9-30-04
AGENDA - Date
8/16/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~"')" GRIER <br />'~" , REEVES <br />,Ii. & LAWLE~ P.c. <br />CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS <br /> <br />3424 Texas Boulevard 903.793.5695 <br />Texarkana, Texas 75503-3248 ax 903.794.2112 <br /> <br />mail@grlcpa.co <br /> <br />MEMBER OF THE AME ICAN <br />INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLI ACCOUNTANTS <br /> <br />To the Officers <br />McClanahan and Holmes, PLLC <br /> <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practi e of McClanahan <br />and Holmes, PLLC (the firm) in effect for the year ended March 31, 2003. A syste of quality control <br />encompasses the firm's organizational structure and the policies adopted and procedu es established to <br />provide it with reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards. The ements of quality <br />control are described in the Statements on Quality Control Standards issued by the A erican Institute of <br />Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The design of the system and complianc with it are the <br />responsibility of the firm. Our responsibility is to express an opinion 00 the design of th system, and the <br />firm's compliance with the system based on our review. <br /> <br />Our review was conducted in accordance with standards established by the Peer Re iew Board of the <br />AICPA. In performing our review, we obtained an understanding of the system of qu lity control for the <br />firm's accounting and auditing practice. In addition, we tested compliance with the fir's quality control <br />policies and procedures to the extent we considered appropriate. These tests covered the application of <br />the firm's policies and procedures on selected engagements. Because our review was ased on selective <br />tests, it would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system of quality control r all instances of <br />lack of compliance with it. <br /> <br />Because there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality c ntrol, departures <br />from the system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of system of quality <br />control to future periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality control may be me inadequate <br />because of changes in conditions or because the degree of compliance with the polic es or procedures <br />may deteriorate. ' <br />, <br /> <br />In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of McClanahan arid <br />Holmes, PLLC, in effect for the year ended March 31, 2003, has been designed to mee the requirements <br />of the quality control standards for an accounting and auditing practice established by e AICP A and was <br />complied with during the year then ended to provide the firm with reasonable assura ce of conforming <br />with professional standards. <br /> <br />~J~l <br /> <br /> <br />,/e. <br /> <br />August19,2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.