Laserfiche WebLink
Special City Council Meetrng <br />July 27, 2004 <br />Page 12 <br />pressure but has had to cut out his medication. He said he is working here for <br />the benefits and he is also a citizen and his taxes have gone up. He had planned <br />to retire at age forty-three (43) but now he will have to work eight (8) or nine <br />(90 more years. He said we have to feed our families and wanted the Council <br />to do the right thing. <br />Mark Shew from Public Works, Water and Sewer Department, came forward <br />and asked if a person who was thirty-eight (38) years old and had fifteen (15) <br />years of service with the City, when will they be able to retire with the Rule of <br />80. He said he knew a lady who worked for the City with just that and under <br />the current plan she could retire in five more years. He asked if she would have <br />to work twenty (20) more years before she could retire. <br />Councilman Bell said the retirement and the Rule of 80 was just about the City <br />paying medical benefits, so that would mean that she could still retire at twenty <br />(20) years but wouldn't get her medical benefits paid by the City. Mr. Bell said <br />that if 10% of the employees retired per year for five (5) years that would be <br />thirty-five (35) annually, that would add $200,000.00 for the cost of insurance <br />per year, which would add up to $1 million dollars. He said even if the cost <br />didn't go through the roof, there would be another $1 million added to that and <br />that is what the City is facing. He said if the Council does nothing, the system <br />for the insurance will go bankrupt and that is because of retiring employees. He <br />felt the Rule of 80 plan needed to be studied. He said this Council is challenged <br />with coming up with more income or making additional cuts. <br />Bill Wilhite, who works for Sanitation, came forward and said he had his own <br />business but sold it to move back here with his family. He said all he hears is <br />cut, cut, cut. He said when they cut people in the shop, they are going to have <br />to wait to get things fixed, when they cut people, they are cutting services. He <br />asked the Council to look at what could be saved in the budget instead of <br />cutting people. He felt that if they would look at saving money instead of <br />cutting that would be better. <br />Councilman Wilson said the Council is faced with a$1,500,000.00 shortfall. <br />