09-D Atmos Energy Interv - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

STATUS REPORT FOR A TMOS/TXU GAS DOCKETS *** SEE BOLD ED TEXT IN STATUS SECTION FOR ACTION NEEDED BY CITIES *** DOCKET NO.1 DESCRIPTION WHE RE STATUS DATE FILED PENDING GUD No. 9400 Full rate case filed Travis Final Order was issued by the RRC on May 25, 2004, Filed 5/2003 by TXU using 2002 County granting an $11.5 million annual rate increase, approving test year and asking (Austin) uniform rates throughout the system and shifting $17.6 TXU Appeal: for $70 million rate District million in costs from the commercial and industrial classes GN402652 increase, uniform Court to the residential class; the Final Order was appealed by Filed 8/17/2004 rates throughout TXU, all of the city groups, and Chaparral Steel; the appeal entire TXU Gas dockets have been inactive since the initial filings other service area, and to than interventions filed by various parties to the original shift more of total RRC docket. costs to residential customers GUD No. 9460 Curtailment rules RRC Closed docket: After transition to Atmos in October, 2004, Filed 5/2003 tariff severed from company filed motion to withdraw and Commission Severed 10/2004 GUD No. 9400 dismissed. GOO No. 9461 Quality of service RRC Active docket: cities have taken the position that service Filed 5/2003 rules tariff severed rules and regulations are within the exclusive jurisdiction of Severed 10/2004 from GUD No. 9400 cities and RRC does not have appellate jurisdiction as rates are not involved; briefing as to jurisdictional and other threshold issues will be filed in January and early February with a ruling by the examiner scheduled for late February or early March; hearing on the merits in June if not dismissed. GOO No. 9462 Line extension RRC Active docket: cities have taken the position that line Filed 5/2003 policy tariff severed extension policy determinations are within the exclusive Severed 10/2004 from GUD No. 9400 jurisdiction of cities and RRC does not have appellate jurisdiction as rates are not involved; company has filed a motion to dismiss; examiner asked for clarification of what rules will apply if docket is dismissed; further ruling expected in January or February, 2005. GUD No. 9463 Rider CAlF (capital RRC Pending but inactive docket: Proposed tariff is similar to Filed 5/2003 adjustment GRIP statute and was included in the May 2003 rate filing Severed 10/2004 investment factor) package before the GRIP legislation had finally passed. tariff severed from Atmos may dismiss this docket now that RRC has adopted GUD No. 9400 a GRIP rule to govern cases over which the RRC has original jurisdiction. 1668\OO\Status chart re Atmos- TXU Gas dockets Page 1