My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05 Lake Crook
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2005
>
01 January
>
2005 01-20
>
05 Lake Crook
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2005 11:15:09 AM
Creation date
1/14/2005 6:53:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
05 Lake Crook
AGENDA - Type
MISCELLANEOUS
Description
Lake Crook Development Study
AGENDA - Date
1/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br />t- <br /> <br />~ of Paris <br /> <br />Study of Lake Crook <br /> <br />March, 2001 <br />I <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />POTENTIAL USES OF THE'LAKE <br /> <br />3.1 <br /> <br />OBSTACLES TO DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />3.1.1 Water and Sewer Availability. As discussed in paragraph 2.1.3 Public Utilities, in the <br />section on existing improvements, there are currently no public sewer or \vater utilities anywhere <br />on the lake except at the water treatment plant itself. Since water is pumped into town only when <br />ground storage tanks in Paris dictate it, pumping is intermittent. A pumping station utilizing <br />either variable speed pumps and ground storage facilities or conventional pumps and elevated <br />storage would be required to distribute water to the south, west and north shores of the lake. A <br />large development involving a thousand lots or so would dictate the need for elevated storage for <br />maintaining pressure, <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />Sanitary sewer is available only through the use of several lift stations scattered along the shore <br />lines, Because there are at least five sub-drainage areas actually entering the lake on the north <br />shore, it would be necessary to install approximately five separate lift stations to lift se\vage east <br />to the dam where the sewer could gravity flo\v eastward across U.S. 271 to the existing sewer <br />trunk lines. An alternative solution would be to install a pressure system in which each home <br />\vould have a small lift station of its own to lift into a small diameter pressurized main. This <br />would obviate the necessity for manholes or gravity lines throughout the housing development <br />but would require more long term maintenance in monitoring and replacing individual home lift <br />stations, Current TNRCC regulations require the city (or other utility company) to monitor and <br />maintain the individual home lift station units even though they are installed on private property. <br /> <br />An imperative in the use of the larger lift stations and gravity mains would be a provision for <br />generators at each lift station to provide alternative power supplies in the event of loss of <br />commercial power. Another concern would be the use of secondary containment around lift <br />stations to contain any sewer overflow before it could reach the lake, <br /> <br />Earlier in this report we discussed the special water quality regulations for Lake Crook that <br />dictate I-acre minimum size lots for anyon-site disposal system. The consultant further <br />recommends that no septic fields, lines, or tanks be permitted within three hundred feet of the lake <br />or a stream leading to the lake, <br /> <br />The installation of a water distribution network for any residential or commercial development <br />of the shoreline properties should only be allowed with large diameter pipe (6-inch minimum <br />diameter) designed to carry fire flows into the neighborhood. Fire hydrants and valves should <br />also be required in keeping with the city subdivisio~ regulations. <br /> <br />3.1.2 Watershed Management. Lake Crook has largely been replaced by Lake Pat Mayse as <br />a water supply for the city. However, the city does occasionally draw several nùllion gallons of <br />water per day and is permitted up to the equivalent of 10 million gallons per day per year. That <br />fact and the use of the lake as a contact recreation and fishing lake make it imperative that the city <br />impose strict development regulations concerning uses along the shores of the lake. A suggested <br />list of regulations occurs on page 35 of this study. <br /> <br />Page 19 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.