My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05 Lake Crook
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2005
>
01 January
>
2005 01-20
>
05 Lake Crook
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2005 11:15:09 AM
Creation date
1/14/2005 6:53:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
05 Lake Crook
AGENDA - Type
MISCELLANEOUS
Description
Lake Crook Development Study
AGENDA - Date
1/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />~ of Paris <br /> <br />Stud1. of Lake Crook <br /> <br />March, 2001 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />enough problem by itself to inhibit the såle of property around Lake Crook. <br /> <br />3.1.6. Water Clarity. While it can generally be ackno\vledged that Lake Crook is an asset to <br />the City of Paris, can it be likewise acknowledged that Lake Crook is a muddy, turbid body of <br />water, a fact \vhich detracts from its potential beauty? Lake Crook is not th~ same as the Villages <br />of Lake Palestine, Holly Lake Ranch, Hide Away Lake, Lake Cypress Springs, Lake Ouachita <br />at Hot Springs, Arkansas or any of the more famous regional lake developments. These lakes <br />have clear, sometimes spring fed water. <br /> <br />During public participation meetings, several individuals brought up the subject of dredging Lake <br />Crook. Cleaning an 80-year old lake of siltation is an expensive task. There are essentially two <br />methods which can be used. One is to drain the lake down and allow the bottom to harden to the <br />point where standard earth moving equipment like scrapers, back hoes or drag lines can remove <br />the silt. This may take years given that you must have a dry period for the lake bottom to firm <br />and for silt to be de-watered before it can be hauled off. Further, there is no way of lo\vering <br />Lake Crook without constructing some alternative pipe spillway, building a siphon, pumping, or <br />breaching the dam. All of these are costly and breaching may be unpredictable. \Ve do not <br />recommend any consideration be given to breaching the dam. <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />The second method is to use shallow \vater barge mounted dredges. \Vhiterock Lake is the most <br />recent success story. This urban Dallas Lake is almost exactly the size of Lake Crook and has <br />nearly the identical square miles of watershed. It also was built in the 1920's. Whiterock was <br />dredged in 1995-1996 at a cost of nearly $14.0 million which included a 17 mile force main for <br />the dredgings to be pumped to an abandoned gravel pit near Duncanville. A similar project was <br />completed two years later on a larger lake for the City of San Angelo. Their dredging project <br />cost a mere $9.5 million but land \vas available adjacent to the lake on \vhich to pump silt. Based <br />on these and other dredging <br />projects with \vhich \ve are <br />familiar, we estimate a dredging <br />project for Lake Crook would <br />cost between $5.0 and $6.5 <br />million dollars. A permit is <br />required from the Army Corps of <br />Engineers and from the TNRCC <br />before dredging can be done. <br />The chief ad vantage to dredging <br />over lowering of the water level is <br />that use of the lake is continuous. .'. <br />even \vhile dredging is taking ~ ~:.;' <br />place. , . even for fishing. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 9 Effects of erosion seen on south shore <br /> <br />Page 21 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.