My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05 Lake Crook
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2005
>
01 January
>
2005 01-20
>
05 Lake Crook
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2005 11:15:09 AM
Creation date
1/14/2005 6:53:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
05 Lake Crook
AGENDA - Type
MISCELLANEOUS
Description
Lake Crook Development Study
AGENDA - Date
1/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />SV of Paris <br /> <br />Studt of Lake Crook <br /> <br />March, 2001 <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Question: Would you be willing to pay higher water and wastewater bills to pay for the <br />extension of water and wastewater utility lines to this area if developed for resi dentinl <br />h . ? <br />; ouslng. <br /> <br />Overwhelming opposition arose not only in the 89.4% out of 1,433 respondents but <br />the item drew much written commentary. General co nsensus 0 f those surveyed is that <br />developers should pay the expenses for development. Admittedly the statement, <br />"would you be willing to pay. . . " always evokes such comments. <br /> <br />Question: Should the city authorize creation of a "non-profit housing development <br />partnership" to create "affordable" or "subsidized" housing around Lake Crook? <br /> <br />9 3 .2 % 0 fthe 1,429 respondents felt strongly that the city should not create a special <br />housing partnership nor should they build "affordable" or "subsidized" housing <br />around Lake Crook, <br /> <br />Question: Should the city divest itself of surplus lands around the lake to the <br />highest bidder? <br /> <br />Tills question one would think would be more evenly divided based on the comments <br />received orally. However, those surveyed said the city should NOT divest itself of <br />property to the highest bidder by a five to one margin. <br /> <br />Question: Should the city continue leasing Lake Crook properly to Archers for Christ, <br />the Ma:o::ey black powder Rifle Club, and Paris Skeet and Trap Club, Inc.? <br /> <br />Over two thirds of those surveyed said the city should continue leasing to these <br />entities. <br /> <br />Question: What are you r concerns about members of your family using any potential <br />park iltzprovelnents at Lake Crook? <br /> <br />This turned out to be a discussion question and provided pages and pages of comment <br />by those surveyed. The following is a tabulation of the reasons given. Respondents <br />could circle more than one reply. <br /> <br />Page 6 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.