Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OVERVIEW. 2005 <br /> <br />Employee Name Thomas E. Hunt. III <br /> <br />Title: <br /> <br />Municipal Court Judge <br /> <br />Performance Council Scoring by Council Person Total Average <br />Category (Initials for each Council Person) Points Points per <br /> D-1 D-2 D-3 D-4 D-5 D-6 D-7 Category <br /> M.A.F. K.W. R.P. S.B. C.F. D.W. J.B. <br />(1) Fairness <br />(2) Follows the law <br />(3) Creates effective <br />punishments <br />(4) Expedites case load <br />(5) Peñorms <br />administrative duties <br />(6) Manages budget <br />(7) Magistrate functions <br />(8) Integrity <br />(9) Courtesy <br />(10) Interrelationships <br />(11) Communicates <br />effectively <br />AGGREGATE TOTAL POINTS (Add total points for categories (1) through (11)) <br />AVERAGE COMPOSITE EVALUATION RATING (Aaareaate Total Points) = <br /> (11 categories X 11 evaluators) <br /> <br />The Average Composite Evaluation Rating should be interpreted as follows: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />A rating below 1.5 is unsatisfactory. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />A rating between 1.5 and 2.4 is below average. <br /> <br /> <br />A rating between 2.5 and 3.4 is good. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />A rating between 3.5 and 4.4 is very good. <br /> <br /> <br />A rating between 4.5 and 5.0 is outstanding. <br /> <br />~ <br />