Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> Regular Council Meeting <br /> January 23, 2012 <br /> Page 4 <br /> <br /> Street location. After the collapse of that building, Mr. Anderson instructed code enforcement to <br /> do a visual survey of the downtown area to determine if there were any other hazards that could <br /> potentially be a public safety issue and that those locations had warning tape placed on them and <br /> barricaded. Mr. Anderson said that an appropriate reprimand would be issued for prior failure to <br /> action. He said that instructions had also been given to conduct Building and Standards <br /> Commission meetings on a monthly basis, because the Commission was beneficial to the City. <br /> Mr. Anderson said the City was going to investigate the possibility of performing some <br /> demolition work itself as a cost savings measure. Mr. Anderson said the City Attorney would <br /> update the City Council on what legal means were currently available for the City to deal with <br /> dilapidated structures and that the City Attorney would be attending the next Building and <br /> Standards Commission meeting to give them an update. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hashmi inquired if there were any questions. Mr. Anderson answered questions <br /> from several Council Members. Mayor Hashmi asked Don Wilson if he had any comments. Mr. <br /> Wilson said the Building and Standards Commission was concerned that historically there had <br /> not been enough follow-up. He said if the Commission issued an order to demolish or repair a <br /> building that it should not be the Staff's decision to decide whether or not the owner had enough <br /> money to do it and that the owner should be forced to do something. Mayor Hashmi suggested <br /> in the future a complaint of this nature be filed with the department head and/or the City <br /> Manager. Mr. Wilson said after the Commission makes a recommendation and nothing happens, <br /> that he would like for the Commission to come back and report to the City Council what was and <br /> was not done. Mayor Hashmi said he agreed but hoped that after the Commission met, that the <br /> work would be completed. <br /> <br /> Council Member McCarthy arrived at 6:08 p.m. <br /> <br /> As reported in a briefing earlier in September, City Attorney Kent McIlyar said that the <br /> Texas Supreme Court ruled on a Building and Standards Commission case out of the City of <br /> Dallas. He said that the City of Dallas Commission was similar to the City of Paris Building and <br /> Standards Commission, in that they were based upon the same State Law. Mr. McIlyar stated <br /> that the Court in the Dallas case changed thirty, forty, fifty years of jurisprudence in the State of <br /> Texas and up until this summer, cities were given the authority under State Law to create <br /> Buildings and Standards Commissions, appoint members and have those Commissions <br /> determine based upon the evidence presented at their hearings, whether or not structures on <br /> property were a public nuisance. In the event that they found that these structures were <br /> dangerous or hazardous to the public, they were allowed by State Law to issue a demolition <br /> order requiring demolition of the property. If the structure was not demolished by the property <br /> owner as often the case, it gave the City the right to tear it down and assess a lien against the <br /> property for the costs of demolition. Mr. McIlyar said that had been the legal process for thirty, <br /> forty, fifty years. Mr. McIlyar said the City of Dallas case involved a residential structure that <br /> had been abandoned for ten years and had a fallen tree on top of it. He told Council that the case <br /> in Dallas went through the City of Dallas' Building and Standards Commission and they ordered <br /> it demolished. Mr. McIlyar said the Texas Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision held that only a <br /> judicial court independent of the City of Dallas was allowed to determine whether or not a <br /> property was a public nuisance and may be demolished by the City. The Court further ruled that <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> 5 <br />