My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06. Minutes from various meetings
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2012
>
02 February
>
02.27.12
>
06. Minutes from various meetings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2012 9:09:46 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 9:09:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
Doc Name
06
Doc Type
Agenda
CITY CLERK - Date
2/27/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> removing two of the existing windows and replacing them with aluminum intake <br /> louvers to vent the new equipment. One window on the south side will require the <br /> window being removed and the area to be enlarged to accommodate the intact <br /> louver; additional two other windows will be removed on the east side and <br /> replaced with aluminum intake louvers. Chairman Starrett asked if this is strictly <br /> a building housing engineering equipment with no employees. Mr. Saunders <br /> stated yes this building has one to two employees with a small office area; its <br /> primary function is to house equipment. Chairman Starrett further stated that <br /> since this is a mechanical building use only, we need to look at this differently <br /> than if it were a publically occupied building. Commissioner Vaughan stated the <br /> enlarged window shown on the drawing only shows a header being replaced on <br /> the window; are you going to replace the cast concrete that was originally around <br /> the window. Mr. Saunders stated it would not be a problem to add it; however <br /> they were trying to deemphasize the window versus drawing attention to it. <br /> Motion was made by Britin Bostick, seconded by Ben Vaughan to approve the <br /> COA. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> <br /> B. 36 Clarksville Street - Sugar Shack - Bud Mackey business owner presented the <br /> petition. Mr. Mackey stated he would like to add a Coke Cola border on the top <br /> portion of the existing windows. He originally wanted to add the border to the <br /> bottom and top, however, City Staff informed him that would be too much <br /> signage according the sign ordinance. Motion was made by Douglas Cox, <br /> seconded by Britin Bostick to approve the COA. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> <br /> E. 20 North Plaza - Paris Bridal - Monica Aquino, property owner; and Alex <br /> Pickering, Scott's Custom Signs presented the petition. Alex stated she will only <br /> be presenting the sign portion of the COA. Chairman Starrett stated that the <br /> primary fagade of this building burned more than 50 years ago and were replaced <br /> by the porcelain tiles you see here. Furthermore restoration of the original fagade <br /> is not possible because there are not any of those components left. Jeanna Scott, <br /> Historic Preservation Officer stated that the original fagade was completely <br /> destroyed in 1959 and redesigned by Denney Architects to reflect the porcelain <br /> tiles that are currently a part of the fagade. Alex Pickering stated the letters will <br /> be form letters placed on the front of the fagade. Chairman Starrett stated that the <br /> signage appears to compliment the design of the fagade. Monica Aquino stated <br /> she wants to replace the current tile with a granite black tile to match the look. <br /> Ms. Aquino stated she could not find replacement tile for the existing damaged <br /> areas. Motion was made Ben Vaughan, seconded by David Stewart to approve <br /> the COA. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> <br /> Motion was made by Ben Vaughan, seconded by Britin Bostick to recuse Douglas <br /> Cox from item 3D. Motion carried 5-0. <br /> <br /> D. 946 South Main Street - Douglas Cox - Douglas Cox, property owner presented <br /> the petition. Mr. Cox stated he needs to do roofing work to his home, wants to go <br /> back with the slate color composite shingle versus the black which has tendency <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> . 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.