Laserfiche WebLink
<br />G~ì"'~ GRIER <br />.,L/ RE EVES <br />I / <br />.I'b & LAWLEY, PC. <br />CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS <br /> <br />3424 Texas Boulevard <br />Texarkana, Texas 75503-3248 <br /> <br />903.793.5695 <br />Fax 903.794'2112 <br /> <br />mail@grlcpa.com <br /> <br />MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN <br />INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS <br /> <br />To the Officers <br />McClanahan and Holmes, PLLC <br /> <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of McClanahan <br />and Holmes, PLLC (the firm) in effect for the year ended March 31, 2003. A system of quality control <br />encompasses the firm's organizational structure and the policies adopted and procedures established to <br />provide it with reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards. The elements of quality <br />control are described in the Statements on Quality Control Standards issued by the American Institute of <br />Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The design of the system and compliance with it are the <br />responsibility of the firm. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system, and the <br />firm's compliance with the system based on our review. <br /> <br />Our review was conducted in accordance with standards established by the Peer Review Board of the <br />AICPA. In performing our review, we obtained an understanding of the system of quality control for the <br />firm's accounting and auditing practice. In addition, we tested compliance with the firm's quality control <br />policies and procedures to the extent we considered appropriate. These tests covered the application of <br />the firm's policies and procedures on selected engagements. Because our review was based on selective <br />tests, it would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system of quality control or all instances of <br />lack of compliance with it. <br /> <br />Because there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control, departures <br />from the system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of a system of quality <br />control to future periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality control may become inadequate <br />because of changes in conditions or because the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures <br />may deteriorate. <br /> <br />In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of McClanahan and <br />Holmes, PLLC, in effect for the year ended March 31,2003, has been designed to meet the requirements <br />of the quality control standards for an accounting and auditing practice established by the AICPA and was <br />complied with during the year then ended to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of conforming <br />with professional standards. <br /> <br />~/~J~/~e. <br /> <br />August 19, 2003 <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. . ¡ <br /> <br />,I I'.: " <br />