Laserfiche WebLink
- PRELIMINARY DRAFT - <br />FOR DISCUSSION <br />PURPOSES ONLY <br />Independent Auditors' Report <br />Board of Directors <br />Paris Economic Development Corporation <br />Paris, Texas <br />We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Paris Economic Development Corporation (PEDC), a <br />component unit of the City of Paris, Texas, as of and for the year ended September 30, 2011, as listed in the table of <br />contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of PEDC's management. Our responsibility is to express <br />an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. <br />We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. <br />Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the <br />financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence <br />supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting <br />principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement <br />presentation. We believe that our audit provides us with a reasonable basis for our opinion. <br />In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position <br />of PEDC as of September 30, 2011, and the results of its activities for the year then ended in conformity with <br />accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. <br />Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The <br />Continuing Disclosure Information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the <br />financial statements. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the <br />financial statements, and accordingly, we express no opinion on it. <br />The Budgetary Comparison Information on Page 9 is not a required part of the financial statements but is <br />supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. <br />We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the <br />methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit <br />the information and express no opinion on it. <br />Management has omitted the management's discussion and analysis that accounting principles generally accepted in <br />the United States of America require to be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such missing <br />information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting <br />Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of the financial reporting for placing the basic financial <br />statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. Our opinion on the basic fmancial <br />statements is not affected by this missing information, <br />- PRELIMINARY DRAFT - <br />CertifiF@F6QJ <br />PURPOSES ONLY <br />, 2012 <br />Paris, Texas <br />