Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />MODEL STAFF REPORT <br />ON ATMOS MID-TEX SHOW CAUSE RESOLUTION <br /> <br />Purpose of the Resolution: <br /> <br />Municipalities have original jurisdiction over gas utility rates within the city. <br />Municipalities have authority under the Gas Utility Regulatory Act ("GURA") to initiate a <br />proceeding to determine whether the existing rates being charged by a gas utility are <br />unreasonable or in violation of the law. This resolution exercises that authority and requires <br />Atmos Mid-Tex Division to file a rate filing package with the City in order for the City to <br />determine whether Atmos' rates are excessive. <br /> <br />Why this Resolution is necessary: <br /> <br />The last rate case at the Railroad Commission affecting the gas distribution system now <br />owned by Atmos Mid-Tex was GUD No. 9400. At that time, the system was owned by TXU <br />Gas Company, which had very different operating expenses and debt structure from Atmos. The <br />rates currently being charged, therefore, are not based on Atmos' cost of service or on its capital <br />structure. As a result, Atmos is most likely over-earning and receiving a greater return than was <br />authorized by the Commission in GUD No. 9400. Atmos has made numerous public statements <br />regarding the reduction of its operating expenses and the increased revenues it has been making <br />from its Texas systems. <br /> <br />The piecemeal ratemaking fostered by the GRIP interim surcharges prevents a thorough, <br />comprehensive review of Atmos' cost of service, and would be illegal under traditional <br />ratemaking in the public interest. Once the GRIP surcharge is in place, it is updated annually <br />until the next general rate case; however, that next case can be delayed by the Company for more <br />than five years. Second, while predicated as a surcharge to promptly recover investment in new <br />and replacement infrastructure designed to improve system safety and reliability, a substantial <br />portion of the GRIP requests have been based upon new office furniture, computers and other <br />cost efficiency measures more likely to benefit shareholders than ratepayers. Some of the <br />investments included by Atmos in its GRIP filings have a depreciable life of five years or less. <br />Thus, a rate case over five years after the GRIP surcharge is implemented will be too late to <br />determine the reasonableness of such investments as they will have already been completely <br />depreciated. <br /> <br />Explanation of "Be It Resolved" Paraeraphs: <br /> <br />1. This paragraph requires Atmos to file a rate filing package with the City by <br />December 31,2005, based upon a test year ending June 30, 2005. The filing is directed to be on <br />a system-wide basis, meaning that every city in the coalition will receive the same filing and will <br />be able to review the filing jointly. In August 2005, the City of Dallas adopted a show cause <br />resolution and required Atmos to file by November 15, 2005, based upon the same test year. <br />This paragraph also requires Atmos to file an electronic version of its filing package. Although <br />the Company keeps all of its information in electronic form, Atmos has caused delays of weeks <br /> <br />~ <br />i. <br />, <br /> <br />1668\ 13\othO51 0 14 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />I <br />