My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19-A-1 - Atty's Report - CAPP
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
06 - June
>
June 11, 2001
>
19-A-1 - Atty's Report - CAPP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 11:17:48 AM
Creation date
6/7/2001 8:09:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
19-A-(1)
AGENDA - Type
ATTORNEY'S REPORT
Description
CAPP
AGENDA - Date
6/11/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
electric supplier arrangement to a new REP. <br />► Statewide, TXU won the bid through the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to be what is <br />called the "provider of last resort" for residential and small non-residential users in the long <br />term. That designation means when residential users begin to leave their current provider <br />(and they have protection for some period of time), but fail to make a timely election as to <br />who will be their REP, state law mandates TXLT as the winning bidder will become the <br />provider of last resort. This arrangement assures there will be no interruption of power. <br />However, the rate for electric service by the provider of last resort will also presumably be <br />much higher than could be found by purchasing the power from one of the other competitors. <br />► There was discussion about the impact of this process on the cities' pending budget process. <br />The question was what sort of power cost do cities budget for their ensuing fiscal year. <br />Special counsel for CAPP, Mr. Geoffrey Gay, and the consultant, R. J. Covington Consulting, <br />offered to provide a formula based on what is called the "price-to-beat" for cities to calculate <br />a cost to put in the budget. In doing so, this price will probably be very conservative, and <br />hopefully this price will be improved by the competitive process, but it will give cities a factor <br />to use in the budgetary process. This formula was promised within the next thirty days. <br />► The question of street lighting was raised and how that billing would be handled following <br />deregulation. Street lighting will probably continue to be part ofthe transmission/distribution <br />service provider's (TDSP) responsibility on the basis of the price-to-beat for the next five <br />years. This basically reflects the fact that under the current regulatory scheme, nobody has <br />yet figured out how to handle the responsibility for maintaining the street lights, a <br />responsibility previously assumed by the power companies. Originally, the PUC was looking <br />at street lighting as a so-called competitive service, but fortunately that perspective was <br />changed either during the legislative or administrative process. As a consequence, street <br />lighting will probably continue to be handled much the same way as it is now for the near <br />future. <br />► All the cities were asked to request from TXLT data for the last fifteen months, including the <br />last quarter for comparison purposes to the data that each of the cities generated. <br />► It was also pointed out that during the ensuing year and perhaps for quite sometime <br />thereafter, cities will need to continue to have someone track their electric consumption data <br />in the format recently used to provide it to the CAPP consultants in order to continually <br />update the consumption package for purposes of bidding. What the consultants are most <br />interested in is kilowatt hours, total kilowatts, and dollars in expenditure for all city accounts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.