2070 ORD CLOSING HEARING GIVEN TO REAL AND TRUE OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING ON CERTAIN STREET IN COP

Home Browse Search

(e) That upon the filing of said estimates, the City Council did, by or dinance duly enacted on the 13th day of December, 1971, provide for and order a hearing to be held at 7:00 o'clock P. M., on the lOth day of January, 1972, in the City Council Room, City Hall, Paris, Texas, at which time an d place all persons, firms, corporations and estates owning or claiming any such abutting pro- perty, or any interest therein, an d their agents and attorneys, and all other persons interested therein, were to appear and to be heard in person or by counsel, and such ordinance directed that the City Clerk give due notice of such hearing in the manner required by law. (f) That after due publication of notice, as required by law, on the lOth day of January, 1972, at 7:00 o'clock P. M., said hearing was opened and held in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time and place an opportunity was given to all of the above mentioned parties and their agents and attorneys to be heard or offer evidence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following appeared and testified as follows: J. E. Albright, the Director of Public Works of the City of Paris, briefly described the improvements constructed an d explained the method of apportionment of the costs of such improvements between the City of Paris, the Texas Highway Department and the abutting property and the owners thereof. The City Attorney then pointed out that notice of the hearing had been published in the Paris News at the time and in the manner required by law, and that such contained proposed rates to be assessed against the abutting property and its owners and the estimated total amount of the whole improvement, and that a copy of the notice had been mailed to the abutting property owners. The City Manager, C. L. Walker, testified an d advised the Council of the respective values of the improvements and the degree to which they enhanced the value of the respective abutting property and that, in his opinion, the abutting properties, and each of them, were enhanced in value by the building of said improvements in an amount greater than the assessments against such pro- perties.