Laserfiche WebLink
(f) That after due publicatiDn of notice, as required by law, <br />on the 9th day of December, 1968, at 7s00 o'clock P. M,, <br />said hearing was opened and held in accordance with said <br />ordinance and notice, at which time and place an opporti <br />tunity was given to all of the above mentioned parties <br />and their agents and attorneys to be heard or offer evi. <br />dence as to all matters in accordance with said ordinance <br />and notice, at which time the following appeared and testi•» <br />fied as follows a <br />J, E, Albright, the Director of Public VJorks of the City <br />of Paris, briefly described the improvements proposed to <br />be constructed and explained the method of apportionment <br />of the costs of such improvements between the City and <br />the abutting property and the owners thereof. <br />The City Atto rney then pointed out that notice of the <br />hearing had been published in the Paris News at the time <br />and in the manner required by law, and that such contained <br />proposed rates to be assessed against the abutting property <br />and its owners, and that a copy of the notice had been <br />mailed to the abutting property ownerso <br />The City Manager, H. C. Kennemer, testified and advised <br />the Council of the respective values of the improvements <br />and the degree to which they enhanced th e value of the <br />respective abutting property and that, in his opinion, <br />the abutting properties, and each of them, would, if said <br />street were improved, in accordance with the contract and <br />plans and specificatio ns, be enhanced in value in an <br />amount greater than the proposed assessments against such <br />properties. <br />(g) That at said hearing the following property owners were <br />present and off'ered objections or testimony as to said <br />improvements, contracts or assessments therefor, or as <br />to proceedings with reference thereto. <br />(1) None <br />