Laserfiche WebLink
law (f) That after due publication of•00 t oclock p e Miresa d hearing was 1 opened <br />of December, A. D. , 1962, at 7• at which tirne and <br />and held in accordance with said ordinance and notice, their <br />place an opportunity was given to all of the above mentioned parties, <br />agents and attorneys, to be heard or offer evidence as to all matters, in <br />accordance with saio ordinance and notice, at which time the following <br />appeared and testified as follows : <br />J. E. Albright, City Engineer and the Director of Public Works of the City <br />of Paris, briefly described the improvements and explained the method of <br />apportionment of the costs of such improvements between the City and the <br />abutti.ng property and the owners thereof. That he ha.d accepted said im- <br />provements and that they enhanced the value of the property belonging to the <br />abutting property owners in excess of the amount of the assessment. That <br />the costs of the abutting proPerty owners for curb and gutter was $1. 50 per <br />front foot. That the costs for the street improvements ordered was $2.849 <br />per front foot to the abutting property owners. <br />(g) That at said hearing the following property owners were present and offered objections or testimony as to said improvements, contracts or <br />assessments therefor, or as to the proceedings with reference thereto. <br />(1) R. B. Boswell objected to theeasbss t of any amount for curb and <br />gutter or pavement on the lot owri Y him <br />(2) That the City Gouncil has heard al be ef ts Pneenhan ed alue o <br />to testify, object or protest as to the special <br />accrue to said abutting propertY and the real and true owners thereof as <br />compared with the portion of the cost of constructing sa and has he dtall <br />proposed to be assessed against said abutting property, <br />parties appearing and offering testimony, together with all objections and <br />protests relative to any errors, irregu d hastgiven a fullf ande <br />proceedings an d co n t r a c t f o r s a i d i m p <br />fair hearing to all parties making or desiring to make anY such <br />ons dered t all <br />objection or to offer testimony, and has fully examined and <br />of said evidence, matters, testimony, and objections offered. rrect (h) That the City Council did conside an~ did f nd that all proceedingsltand, <br />or deficiencies called to its attention <br />contracts were ProPer' and in a of said Chty Coun ila n refe1rencemto <br />are being had ax~tl with the directves all rescts, valid and <br />such improvements, and that the same are, in Pe <br />regular, as corrected. <br />The Mayor announced that the hearing was closed, and directed the <br />Gity Attorney to prsPare an ordinance incorporating the findings of the <br />City Council when made. <br />