Laserfiche WebLink
(f) That after due publication of notice, as required by law, on the 9th day <br />of September, A. D., 1963, at 7:00 o Eclock P. M. , said hearing was opened <br />and held in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time and <br />place an opportunity was given to all of the above mentioned parties and <br />agents and attorneys to be heard or offer evidence as to all matters in <br />accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following <br />appeared and testified as follows: <br />J. E. Albright, the Director of Public Works of the City of Paris, briefly <br />described the improvements proposed to be constructed and ex.plained the <br />method of apportionrnent of the costs of such improvements between the City <br />and the abutting property and the owners thereof, <br />The City Attorney then pointed out that notice of the hearing had been pub- <br />lished in the Paris News at the time and in the manner required by law, <br />and that such contained proposed rates to be assessed against the abutting <br />property and its owners. <br />The City Manager, H. C. Kennemer, testified and advised the Council of the <br />respective values of the improvements and the degree to which they enhanced <br />the value of the respective abutting property owners, and that, in his opinion, <br />the abutting properties, and each of them, would, if said street were improved <br />in accordance with the contract and plans and specifications, and the curbs <br />and gutters provided for therein were made, constructed, and installed in <br />accordance with the contract and the plans and specifications, be enhanced in <br />value in an amount greater than the proposed assessments against such pro- <br />perties. <br />~g) That at said hearing the following property owners were present and <br />offered objections or testimony as to said improvements, contracts, or <br />asse ssments therefor, or as to the proceedings with reference thereto. <br />Mrs. Elvie J. Copening appeared, and although she did not question <br />the benefits to her property, but admitted that it was beneficial, <br />and she appeared more concerned about the terms under which she <br />could discharge the debt. <br />