My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-C Lake Crook Study
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
07 - July
>
July 09, 2001
>
05-C Lake Crook Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:21:37 AM
Creation date
6/15/2001 7:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
5-C
AGENDA - Type
STUDY
Description
A Study of Lake Crook
AGENDA - Date
6/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cit~ of Paris Stud~ of Lake Crook March~ 2001 <br /> <br />1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY <br /> <br />The goals and objectives of the study are fairly straightforward: <br /> <br />Gather data on the Lake Crook asset <br />Evaluate the needs of the public <br />Recommend a highest and best use or uses of the lake and property based on <br />environmental, economic, and engineering factors. <br /> <br />If successful, this study will provide information to government officials to enable them to <br />embark on a reasonable course of development of an important asset. It will provide thepublic <br />finality to a question looming over the city for years.., what to do with Lake Crook. It will <br />provide the sportsmen and sportswomen (hunters, fishers, archers, shooters, bicyclists and <br />hikers) with information their respective organizations need to go forward, whether here at Lake <br />Crook or somewhere else. And finally, it will provide the building community with answers on <br />whether to embark on their own subdivision developments or wait a while longer for property in <br />and arotmd Lake Crook. <br /> <br />One thing that is NOT an objective of this study is to serve as a substitute for potential developers <br />and builders doing their own due diligence. Potential beneficiaries must conduct their own studies <br />with how developing Lake Crook would impact their own business investments. The plans <br />shown later in the study are "broad-brushed" potential plans of development. There are many, <br />many other options available which could not be held in this one volume. <br /> <br />1.3 METHODOLOGY <br /> <br />The methodology, like the goals and objectives, are very straightforward . . . COLLECT, <br />ANALYZE, RECOMMEND. While it sounds easy, the process is much like herding cats. The <br />problem is not a lack of information but rather a wealth of it. <br /> <br />Gathering data is important because the city has been approached by what seemingly are <br />incompatible potential users of the land and water. The city has accumulated a mass of historical <br />documents concerning Lake Crook lake fi.om the day when it was conceived all the way to the <br />present. This study will endeavor to boil down the information, separate fact from folklore, and <br />present fairly the condition of the lake and what might or might not be done to improve the lake. <br /> <br />Before evaluating the needs of the public, it is essential to find out what the public wants. <br />Unfortunately, in the case of Lake Crook, the public itself is not of one mind. Opinions expressed <br />in open meeting range fi.om "Leave it alone" to "Sell it and make money" and every conceivable <br />position in between. Through the use of surveys and public comment, the study should present <br />the case of most parties for council consideration. <br /> <br />Recommendations and subsequent actions by the city should be based on sound evidence and <br /> <br />Page 3 of 45 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.