Laserfiche WebLink
~_(f) That after due publication of notice, as required by law, on the llth <br />day of November, A. D, , 1963, at 7:00 o'clock P. M., said hearing was <br />opened and held in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time <br />and place an opportunity was given toall of the above mentioned parties and <br />agents and attorneys to be heard or offer evidence as to all matters in <br />accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which time the following <br />appeared and testified as follows: <br />J. E. Albright, the Director of Public Works of the City of Paris, briefly <br />described the improvements proposed to be constructed and explained the <br />method of apportionment of the costs of such improvements between the City <br />and the abutting property and the owners thereof. <br />The City Attorney then pointed out that notice of the hearing had been pub- <br />lished in the Paris News at the time and in the manner required by law, <br />and that such contained proposed rates to be assessed against the abutting <br />property and its owners. <br />The City Manager, H. C. Kennemer, testified and advised the Council of the <br />respective values of the improvements and the degree to which they enhanced <br />the value of the respective abutting property owners, and that, in his opinion, <br />the abutting properties, and each of thern, would, if said street were improved, <br />in accordance with the contract and plans and specifications, and the curbs <br />and gutters provided for therein were made, constructed, and installed in <br />accordance with the contract and the plans and specifications, be eilhanced in <br />value in an amount greater than the proposed assessments against such pro- <br />perties. <br />(g) That at said hearing the following property owners were present and <br />offered objections or testimony as to said improvements, contracts, or <br />assessments therefor, or as to the proceedings with reference thereto. <br />(1) None <br />