Laserfiche WebLink
(b) That a notice duly executed in the name of the City of Paris, Texas, <br />of the enactment of s`aid above described ordinance has heretofore <br />been filed with the County Clerk of Lamar County, Texas, the County <br />in which said Gity of Paris is situated, on the 18th day of November, <br />A. D., 1960, and recorded in Book 371, Page 29 of the Records of <br />Deeds of Lamar County, Texas. <br />(c) That the said City Council, after having advertised for bids by and <br />through the Texas Sta,te Highway Depa rtment , which bids have been <br />accepted by the State Highway Department, in a joint venture with the <br />City of Paris upon the lowest and best bid the refor, the contract has <br />been executed between the Texas State Highway Department and the <br />Austin Road and Bridge Gompany. <br />(d) That the City Council caused the Director of Public Works to prepare <br />and file estimates of the costs of such improvements and estimates <br />of the amount per front foot proposed to be aseessed against the pro- <br />perty abutting each of said streets within the lim'dts defined, and against <br />the real and true owners thereof. <br />(e) That upon the filing of said estimates, the City Gouncil did by ordinance <br />duly enaGted on the lOth day of July, A. D., 1961, provide for and order <br />a hearing to be held at 7:00 o'clock P. M., on the 14th day of August, <br />A. D., 1961, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall of Paris, Texas, , <br />at which time and place all persons, firms, corporations and estates <br />owning or claiming any such abutting property or interest therein, and <br />their agents and attorneys and all other persons interested therein, <br />were to appear and to be heard in person ol by counsel, and such or- <br />dinance directed the City Manager to give due notice of such hearing <br />in the manner required by law. <br />(f) That after due publication of notice as required by law, and on the 14th <br />day of August, A. D., 1961, at 7:00 o'clock P. M., said hParing was <br />opened and held in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which. <br />time and place an opportunity was given to all of the above mentioned <br />parties and agents and attorneys to be heard and to offer evidence as <br />to all matters in accordance with said ordinance and notice, at which <br />time the following appeared and testified as -follows: <br />The Director of Public Works and the City Engineer of the City of <br />Paris briefly described the improvements being constructed and <br />explained the method of apportionment of the costs of such improve- <br />ments between the City, the State Highway Department, and the <br />abutting property and the owners thereof. <br />The City Attorney pointed out that notice of hearing had been pub- <br />lished in the Paris 1Vews at the time and in the manner required by <br />law; that such contained proposed rates to be assessed against the <br />abutting property and its owners with certain exceptions. <br />The City Manager, H. C. Kennemer, testified and advised the Council <br />of the respective values of the improvements and the degree to which <br />they enhanced the value of the respective abutting property owners, <br />and that in his opinion the abutting properties, and each of them, <br />would, upon the completion of said improvements in accordance with <br />trie contract and plans and specifications, be enhanced in value in an <br />amount greater than the proposed assessments against such properties. <br />