My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08 Archers for Christ
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
08 - August
>
August 13, 2001
>
08 Archers for Christ
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2005 11:25:37 AM
Creation date
8/10/2001 12:26:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
8
AGENDA - Type
MOTION
Description
Archers for Christ Lease at Lake Crook
AGENDA - Date
8/13/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cit~ of Paris <br /> <br />Stud~' of Lake Crook <br /> <br />March, 2001 <br /> <br />3.2.2 Recommendations Concerning Option 1. The consultant, recognizing that the plan has <br />significant envkonmental attraction to it by preserving vast amounts of ground for wildlife habitat, <br />cannot support Option 1 as configured now. The cost per lot is too high to make it a viable <br />project. We could support the project more if the West Shore part of this option were not <br />included due to the poor access along the county road. Soil conditions and high water table make <br />it difficult to maintain a high quality, heavy trafficked road along the wetlands on both sides of <br />Caviness Road. Since it is not in the city limits, but borders the city limits, it is unlikely the <br />county will expend vast amounts of money to upgrade this road. <br /> We further could support Option 1 if the development of the commercial tract ~vould be deleted <br /> fi'om consideration and left in a natural state for several years to come. Without the West Shore <br /> development, the commercial tract development would be seriously impeded. <br /> Whereas private roads on the north shore could reduce initial costs of construction and defer city <br /> maintenance of paving and drainage for years to come, we believe the citizens are not best served <br /> by prohibiting free and uninterrupted use of a road along the shoreline. A north shore <br /> development should be designed to later extend streets and utilities north into other lands when <br /> these other tracts are developed. <br /> Finally, if the west shore and the commercial tract were not developed, we can support the <br /> concept ofrene~ving leases to the gun and archery clubs feeling they would no longer be a hazard <br /> to any nearby homes. <br /> <br /> 3.3 OPTION 2 - FULL RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> <br />3.3.1 Description of Option 2. This option <br />provides for the immediate development of certain <br />tracts of land, especially the south shore park, as <br />formal pad( improvements with improved fishing <br />piers, campgrounds, playgrounds, group picnic <br />shelters, family picnic shelters and tables. Other <br />areas would be let~ undeveloped and promoted as <br />wildlife habitat and hunting property. The archery <br />and gun clubs could retain their leases and ranges <br />under this option with some restrictions. Longer <br />leases (twenty or more years) would encourage <br />these clubs to make more meaningful investments <br />into the property in time and money. Short term <br />leases (year to year) will discourage this investment <br />entirely. <br /> <br />Expansion of a hiking/biking trail along the north <br />shore is shown in this option, looping all the way <br />around the dam and spillway and tying back into <br />the developed south shore park. These trails would <br /> <br />Page 26 of 45 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.