Laserfiche WebLink
Cit~ of Paris <br /> <br />Stud~' of Lake Crook <br /> <br />March, 2001 <br /> <br />3.2.2 Recommendations Concerning Option 1. The consultant, recognizing that the plan has <br />significant envkonmental attraction to it by preserving vast amounts of ground for wildlife habitat, <br />cannot support Option 1 as configured now. The cost per lot is too high to make it a viable <br />project. We could support the project more if the West Shore part of this option were not <br />included due to the poor access along the county road. Soil conditions and high water table make <br />it difficult to maintain a high quality, heavy trafficked road along the wetlands on both sides of <br />Caviness Road. Since it is not in the city limits, but borders the city limits, it is unlikely the <br />county will expend vast amounts of money to upgrade this road. <br /> We further could support Option 1 if the development of the commercial tract ~vould be deleted <br /> fi'om consideration and left in a natural state for several years to come. Without the West Shore <br /> development, the commercial tract development would be seriously impeded. <br /> Whereas private roads on the north shore could reduce initial costs of construction and defer city <br /> maintenance of paving and drainage for years to come, we believe the citizens are not best served <br /> by prohibiting free and uninterrupted use of a road along the shoreline. A north shore <br /> development should be designed to later extend streets and utilities north into other lands when <br /> these other tracts are developed. <br /> Finally, if the west shore and the commercial tract were not developed, we can support the <br /> concept ofrene~ving leases to the gun and archery clubs feeling they would no longer be a hazard <br /> to any nearby homes. <br /> <br /> 3.3 OPTION 2 - FULL RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br /> <br />3.3.1 Description of Option 2. This option <br />provides for the immediate development of certain <br />tracts of land, especially the south shore park, as <br />formal pad( improvements with improved fishing <br />piers, campgrounds, playgrounds, group picnic <br />shelters, family picnic shelters and tables. Other <br />areas would be let~ undeveloped and promoted as <br />wildlife habitat and hunting property. The archery <br />and gun clubs could retain their leases and ranges <br />under this option with some restrictions. Longer <br />leases (twenty or more years) would encourage <br />these clubs to make more meaningful investments <br />into the property in time and money. Short term <br />leases (year to year) will discourage this investment <br />entirely. <br /> <br />Expansion of a hiking/biking trail along the north <br />shore is shown in this option, looping all the way <br />around the dam and spillway and tying back into <br />the developed south shore park. These trails would <br /> <br />Page 26 of 45 <br /> <br /> <br />