Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan, City of Paris, Texas <br />Planning Process <br />property owners. In addition, the Planning Commission and the City should try to distinguish <br />between facts and opinions at a public hearing. Unsubstantiated assertions ("This project would <br />reduce the value of my property by 75 percent") or generalizations ("People who live in <br />apartments always drive fast cars and race up and down the streets") should be analyzed for their <br />validity. Even "expert witnesses" should be pressed to give as factual a basis as possible for their <br />judgments. <br />Second, zoning decisions should include consideration of long-range community goals as well as <br />short-range needs. The recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan should be the primary <br />source for this information. Because of its importance in the zoning process, the Comprehensive <br />Plan should be reviewed by the Paris Planning Commission on a regular basis and amended as <br />necessary to ensure that it remains cunent. <br />Third, it is important to zone based on land use issues, not the issues affecting the individual <br />applicant. An error frequently made is approval of a rezoning to accommodate an applicant's <br />personal circumstances without consideration of land use conditions and characteristics. Such a <br />rezoning is rarely in the public interest and, if challenged, can be held to be invalid. Instead, <br />decisions should be based on whether the land is appropriate for the proposed zoning district. <br />Appropriate matters that should be considered for each rezoning application include: <br />1. The character of the neighborhood; <br />2. The zoning and uses of properties nearby; <br />3. The suitability of the subject property for the uses to which it has been restricted; <br />4. The extent to which removal of the restrictions (or change of zone) will <br />detrimentally affect nearby property and the community at large; <br />5. The length of time the property has remained vacant as zoned; <br />6. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare by not rezoning the <br />property as compared to the hardship imposed on the property owner; - <br />7. The adequacy of public utilities and other needed public services <br />8. The recommendation of staff; and <br />9. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />When considering a rezoning application all of the uses which the proposed zoning district <br />permits should be considered rather than just the use the applicant proposes, since a change in <br />ownership or in market conditions could easily result in a change of the proposed use. <br />5A98288\WPClfmal rcpurt 2-0I.Juc 8 B WR <br />