Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive P1an, City of Paris, Texas <br />Planning Principles <br />Such improvements are all part of good neighborhood design-even in furtherance of citywide <br />beautification efforts as launched by the Blue Ribbon Task Force. The Stillhouse Creek corridor, <br />for example, provides a way of linking into residential growth comdors to the north in the North <br />Lamar School District areas. The Depot Park in west Paris could be linked with extension of a <br />linear park along abandoned rail rights-of-way. Such improvements will create alternative <br />transportation corridors to the schools and parks for bicycle and pedestrian traffic. <br />School and park siting to serve residential neighborhoods should be based on a standard of from <br />2,500 to 5,000 people for cost-effective services. Convenience shopping, as well, requires a <br />minimum number of people to support business activity. As residential growth becomes denser <br />through new development and redevelopment of land, the importance of the planning process <br />becomes clear. Land should be reserved and financing in place to add public amenities in certain <br />areas over time. <br />Municipal Services and Natural Features <br />In addition to public land use policy, the physical features of the land affect future development. <br />The broadest, most extensive floodplain in the area is in the Pine Creek basin north of Paris that <br />flows to Lake Crook. Other major creeks flow from the high point of central Paris. <br />The City must plan for development according to the FEMA regulations affecting floodplains to <br />meet federal guidelines; and based on drainage basins to meet sound engineering guidelines. To <br />accommodate the projected future land uses the City must assess its ability to serve existing and <br />additional growth. Once this ability to serve has been assessed, the desire for and <br />appropriateness of a specific use can be weighed against the ability to serve such a use and need <br />for improvements based upon the projected impact of the use. This is especially important when <br />assessing the planned "Urban Service Areas" outside the City's boundaries, as discussed in the <br />next section. <br />Municipal Utilities and the Capacity to Serve Growth <br />In order to determine what type of land uses should be projected for future growth areas, an <br />assessment must be made of the ability of the existing utility infrastructure to serve the additional <br />growth. The desire to allow for a specific land use must be weighed against the ability of the City <br />to serve. The need for improvements will be based upon the impact of the projected use on <br />existing utility systems. The Natural Features Map illustrates the general layout of existing <br />utility systems (sanitary sewer and water) and shows the ability of the Paris systems to serve the <br />future growth areas. The following should be considered when assessing impact of projected <br />land uses on improvements to the system: <br />• What is the capacity of the existing system? <br />• How much capacity is available for additional growth? <br />• Can the existing lines handle additional capacity and if so how much? <br />• How will connections to existing lines be made? <br />• What are the limitations of physical constraints such as ridgelines? <br />• What are existing and currently projected uses? <br />• How will high water users impact the system? <br />5A98288\WPC\final rcpwrt 2-01.Juc 19 B WH <br />