My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-B Comprehensive Plan
City-of-Paris
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2001
>
08 - August
>
August 13, 2001
>
02-B Comprehensive Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2012 11:10:16 AM
Creation date
6/18/2001 8:31:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
AGENDA
Item Number
2-B
AGENDA - Type
STUDY
Description
Comprehensive Master Plan
AGENDA - Date
8/13/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF PARIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />ApPendix A-CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM PROCESS <br />Capital Facilities Planning <br />Plannina is both process-oriented and production-oriented. The first step is to develop a <br />Comprehensive Plan, a process that typically involves four entities-City staff, the Planning <br />Commission, the public at-large, and the City Council. The Paris Planning Commission <br />(hereafter refened to as the "Planning Commission") has begun the "planning process." The <br />second step is to implement the plan. Implementation tools include the capital improvements <br />program (CIP). <br />Within the context of the Comprehensive Plan many of the community's needs, desires, and <br />goals have been discussed. The capital improvements program (CIP) provides an annual process <br />of identifying and establishing priorities for specific improvements in order to achieve those <br />goals. The capital improvements prob am provides a variety of benefits. A more formal CIP <br />process includes more public involvement, and helps assure fiscal implementation. This section, <br />then, recommends both a process by which a capital improvements program can be developed, as <br />well as a procedure by which projects can be ranked. <br />The Process <br />In order to be effective, a capital improvements program (CIP) must integrate community desires <br />and goals in a formalized process of needs assessment and financial programming. The City of <br />Paris has long followed an informal CII' planning process. The Comprehensive Plan establishes <br />a more expanded process to more formally include the Planning Commission and the general <br />public, along with Department Heads and the City Council to adopt the CIP. The more formal <br />process would include invited participants in an annual workshop to review the needed projects, <br />the goals of the plan and the budget available for capital improvements. The meeting may be <br />made a part of an annual plan update prior to budget adoption. The City Engineer and other staff <br />should facilitate the meeting. <br />The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) <br />For the purposes of the City of Paris C1P, a"capital improvement" is any public expenditure for <br />equipment or infrastructure that is greater than $75,000 and funded from other than an <br />emergency appropriation, such as for relief from natural disasters. In order to be effective, a <br />capital improvements program must integrate community desires and goals in a formalized <br />process of needs assessment and financial programming. A basic process for the City involves <br />the coordination of six groups: <br />• The "Capital Facilities Committee" - The Capital Facilities Committee should be led <br />by the City Engineer and include the following staff: Director of Finance, Project/Civil <br />Service Director, Building Official, Director of Public Works, Director of Public <br />Utilities, Fire Chief, Police Chief and Director of Parks and Recreation. In addition, one <br />City Council member and one Planning Commissioner should be appointed. The <br />committee would be responsible for establishing an inventory of capital needs within <br />their respective areas of concern, undertaking an evaluation of each project request, <br />describing each proposed project in sufficient detail for others to understand, and, as a <br />group, providing a preliminary ranking of each project relative to the funding cycle (1-5 <br />S:\98288\WPC\fma1 repon 2-01.doc 80 BWR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.