Laserfiche WebLink
from the prior year (from ,$0.0800 <br />to $0.0909). According to thc comp- <br />troller's ofllce "the legislature wanted <br />to avoid injuring a [city's] ability to <br />pay its debt." Therefore, this <br />expanded calculation was created. <br /> <br />The Consummate Act of Full <br />Disclosure- Forms and Notices <br />\Ve alluded to the "half-page" <br />advertisements required by TNT, <br /> <br />and feel that a more detailed discus- <br />sion is required to appreciate the <br />lengths to which disdosure is taken. <br />Initially, the legal requirements <br />included the "Notice of Appraised <br />Value" from the chief appraiser and <br />the "Public Notice" (actually a quar- <br />ter-page ad), but with a legislatively <br />mandated 18-point type size for the <br />headline. And there were opposing <br />ads placed by cities that contended <br /> <br /> Our history is <br /> the foundation of our pride. <br /> The future <br />is the basis of our excitement. <br /> <br />In today's highly energized business environment, you cannot afford to miss <br />that ever important opportunity. Precise teamwork and coordination <br />are an absolute must--and having First Southwest Company as <br />a member of your team is an integral part of that process. <br /> <br /> Our half-century o fexperience coupled with our <br /> broad range of industry expertise provide the <br /> necessary' tools for that competitive edge. <br /> <br /> FIRST SOUTHWEST COMPANY <br /> INVESTMENT BANKE£S SINCE 1946 <br /> <br />Member SIPC &NASD <br /> <br />1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75201 <br /> 1-800-678-3792 .wvvw. firstsw, com <br /> <br /> Abilene · Austin · Clifton · Dallas · Fort Worth · Houston · LongView <br /> Lubbock · McAllen · San Antonio, T_~vas o Fayetteville, Arkansas <br />Los Angeles, Califbrnia . Atlant~ Georgia · Boca Raton .Miami. Orlando, Florida <br /> <br /> that the required nodces contained <br /> erroneous, or at least misleading, lan- <br /> guage. <br /> There is also a parallel series of <br /> public notices and public hearings, <br /> such that the TNT requirements <br /> occasionally will conflict with local <br /> charter requirements for the same <br /> sequence of events. For example, <br /> the two public hearings cannot hap- <br /> pen simultaneously. A city cannot <br /> use its charter-mandated budget <br /> hearing to substitute for the legisla- <br /> tively mandated "tax increase" pub- <br /> lic hearing. Two separate acts with <br /> essentially the same outcome: <br /> opportunities for public input and <br /> open discussion of budgetary issues. <br /> Local conditions may vary, but <br /> using the typical language from a <br /> Texas home rule charter, the chart <br /> on page 23 shows how the two <br /> calendars compare. <br /> Now, with additional media and <br />public access opportunities, the law <br />has been expanded to accommodate <br />those means of publication and <br />notice announcements. Cities with <br />public access/cable television and <br />those with Web sites are now <br />required to place the public notice <br />information there as well. In addi- <br />tion to the original public notice <br />and its prescribed language (and <br />headline size), other statements and <br />schedules also must be published, <br />depending upon how deeply into <br />the tax increase process the city gets. <br /> For tax year 2000, additional <br />requirements were added to even <br />further "inform" the public. As we <br />researched this article, concurrent <br />with the preparation of our personal <br />federal income taxes, we were con- <br />fused by the similarity of language <br /> <br /> <br />